1 option
Anti-scientific Americans the prevalence, origins, and political consequences of anti-intellectualism in the US Matthew Motta
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Motta, Matt, author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Science--Political aspects--United States.
- Science.
- Science and state--United States.
- Science and state.
- Intellectualization (Psychology).
- National characteristics, American.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Other Title:
- Prevalence, origins, and political consequences of anti-intellectualism in the United States
- Place of Publication:
- New York, NY Oxford University Press [2024]
- Summary:
- "Anti-Scientific Americans offers new theoretical and data-driven insights into the prevalence, origins, and policy consequences of anti-intellectualism in the U.S. Building on recent theoretical advances, the book begins by conceptualizing anti-intellectualism as the dislike and distrust of scientists, academics, and other experts. It then brings together "micro-level" survey data from cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys spanning six decades, and aggregated "macro-level" data from hundreds of opinion polls dating back to the 1940s, to show that anti-intellectualism is both a pervasive and pernicious presence in American public life. One third of Americans can be thought about as holding anti-intellectual attitudes at any given time, which have become increasingly politicized following the rise of the Tea Party in the early 2010s. Reviving often-overlooked insights from Richard Hofstadter's pioneering (1963) work on the subject, the book also shows that anti-intellectualism both shapes and is shaped by Americans' resentment of the role that experts play in the policymaking process. Correspondingly, anti-intellectualism motivates opposition to evidence-based policies in several areas, including on issues related to climate change, economic policy, and resistance to the advice of public health experts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The book also shows that elected officials respond to increases in public ("macro-level") anti-intellectualism by curtailing experts' influence in the policymaking process. Still, Anti-Scientific Americans concludes on an optimistic note by discussing how what we might learn from this book can help reduce the prevalence and pernicious impact of anti-intellectualism in American political life, and restore Americans' faith in experts"-- Provided by publisher
- Contents:
- Cover
- Anti-Scientific Americans : The Prevalence, Origins, and Political Consequences of Anti-Intellectualism in the US
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- 1: Anti-Scientific Americans?
- Conceptualizing Anti-Intellectualism
- It's Personal: Anti-Intellectualism as an Affective and Group-Based Phenomenon
- Expert Dislike and Distrust
- Who Is an Expert? Measuring Anti-Expert Attitudes
- Experts and Intellectuals: The Eye of the Beholder Approach
- The Scientific Community: A More-Narrow Approach
- How Anti-Intellectualism Relates to Populism
- What's at Stake?
- The Plan of This Book
- A Word of Caution: Experts Are People Too
- 2: The Nature and Origins of Anti-Intellectualism
- Understanding Anti-Intellectualism: An Affective and Group-Centric Theory
- Psychologically Unpacking the Group-Based Origins of Expert Dislike and Distrust
- Applying SIT, SCT, and ITT to Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
- The Political Psychological Inputs and Policy-Relevant Outputs of Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
- Static Inputs: Who Holds Anti-Intellectual Attitudes?
- Republican Partisan Identity and Symbolic Ideology
- A Hostile Legacy
- Connecting Anti-Expert Partisan Rhetoric to Public Opinion
- Preferences for Limited Government
- Religiosity
- The Tea Party and the Temporal Dynamics of Asymmetric Polarization
- Dynamic Inputs: What Motivates Change in Anti-Intellectualism?
- Knowledge of Basic Scientific Facts
- Interest in Scientific Research
- Experts' Policy Influence: The Bidirectionality Thesis
- Testing the Group-Centric Model: A Preview
- 3: Validating Two Approaches to Measuring Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement in Public-Opinion Surveys
- A Refresher: Two Approaches to Measuring Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
- The Public-Opinion Data: An Overview
- GSS Time Series Studies (1974-2018)
- GSS Panel Studies (2006-2010, 2008-2012, 2010-2014)
- CSPP Panel Study (2016)
- ANES Pilot Study (2019) and 2020 Time Series Study
- Science and Policy Rolling Cross-Sectional Study (2020-2021)
- Validating the Two Micro-Level Indicators of Anti-Intellectualism
- Content Validation, Part 1: Americans' Definitions of Expertise and How Scientists Contribute to It
- Content Validation, Part 2: How Anti-Intellectual Thought Underpins Evaluations of Scientists
- Convergent Validation: Assessing the Empirical Overlap between the Two Measures
- Conclusion
- 4: The Prevalence of Anti-Intellectual Attitudes
- Macro Anti-Intellectualism Database (1944-2021)
- The Problem with Prevalence
- A Pervasive Problem or an Overhyped Myth?
- A Pluralistic Prevalence Assessment
- 5: Origin Story Part I: Explaining Between-Person Differences in Anti-Intellectual Attitude Endorsement
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index
- Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on September 19, 2024)
- Other Format:
- Print version Motta, Matt. Anti-scientific Americans
- ISBN:
- 9780197788837
- 0197788831
- 9780197788844
- 019778884X
- 0197788823
- 9780197788820
- OCLC:
- 1437533816
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.