1 option
PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, BUDGETING, AND EXECUTION IN COMPARATIVE ORGANIZATIONS VOLUME 6, Additional Case Studies of Selected Non-DoD Federal Agencies / STEPHANIE YOUNG, MEGAN MCKERNAN, RYAN CONSAUL, LAURINDA L. ROHN, FRANK G. KLOTZ, MICHAEL SIMPSON, SARAH W. DENTON, YULIYA SHOKH, MADISON WILLIAMS, RAPHAEL S. COHEN, JOHN P. GODGES, HEIDI PETERS, LAUREN SKRABALA.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Young, Stephanie (Political scientist)
- Series:
- Research report (Rand Corporation) ; A2195-6.
- Report ; A2195-6
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Department of Defense--Appropriations and expenditures.
- United States.
- United States. Department of Veterans Affairs--Appropriations and expenditures.
- United States. National Nuclear Security Administration--Appropriations and expenditures.
- Budget--United States.
- Budget.
- Administrative agencies--United States--Case studies.
- Administrative agencies.
- Armed Forces--Appropriations and expenditures.
- Armed Forces.
- Military Budgets and Defense Spending.
- United States Department of Defense.
- Local Subjects:
- Military Budgets and Defense Spending.
- United States Department of Defense.
- Physical Description:
- xiii, 86 pages : illustrations, maps ; 26 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2024
- Summary:
- The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) System is a key enabler for DoD to fulfill its mission. But in light of a dynamic threat environment, increasingly capable adversaries, and rapid technological changes, there has been increasing concern that DoD's resource planning processes are too slow and inflexible to meet warfighter needs. As a result, Congress mandated the formation of a legislative commission to (1) examine the effectiveness of the PPBE process and adjacent DoD practices, particularly with respect to defense modernization; (2) consider potential alternatives to these processes and practices to maximize DoD's ability to respond in a timely manner to current and future threats; and (3) make legislative and policy recommendations to improve such processes and practices for the purposes of fielding the operational capabilities necessary to outpace near-peer competitors, providing data and analytical insight, and supporting an integrated budget that is aligned with strategic defense objectives. The Commission on PPBE Reform asked RAND to provide an independent analysis of PPBE-like functions in selected countries and other non-DoD federal agencies. This report, part of a seven-volume set, presents case studies of PPBE functions in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to provide additional insights for improving DoD's PPBE processes.
- Contents:
- CHAPTER 1: Introduction
- CHAPTER 2: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- CHAPTER 3: National Nuclear Security Administration
- CHAPTER 4: Key Insights from Selected Non-DoD Federal Agencies Case Studies.
- Notes:
- Title from PDF document (title page; viewed May 8, 2024)
- "Prepared for the Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform"
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 79-86)
- Description from electronic resource
- ISBN:
- 1977413013
- 9781977413017
- OCLC:
- 1433300576
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.