My Account Log in

1 option

Patents / edited by Joseph Scott Miller.

Edward Elgar Law 2010 and earlier Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Miller, Joseph Scott.
Edward Elgar Publishing.
Series:
Critical concepts in intellectual property law ; 1.
Critical concepts in intellectual property law ; 1
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Patent laws and legislation.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (656 p.) : ill. ; cm.
Place of Publication:
Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, c2010.
Summary:
Contemporary patent law continues to struggle with the most basic questions of patent system design. There is fierce debate over the power of the Patent Office, the role of the courts, incentives to guide the process and many other fundamental issues. Professor Miller, in this research review, discusses seminal articles which are acknowledged to be the proper foundations for these ongoing debates. This indispensable research review is vital for patent policy makers and serves as an excellent reference source for anyone with an interest in the topic.
Contents:
Recommended readings (Machine generated): P.J. Federico ([1936] 1990), 'Operation of the Patent Act of 1790', Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 72, 373-85
Steven Lubar (1991), 'The Transformation of Antebellum Patent Law', Technology and Culture, 32 (4), Special Issue, October, 932-59
Mark D. Janis (2002), 'Patent Abolitionism', Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 17, 899-952
Edward C. Walterscheid (2005), 'The Hotchkiss Unobviousness Standard: Early Judicial Activism in the Patent Law', Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 13, 103-35
Edmund W. Kitch (1966), 'Graham v. John Deere Co.: New Standards for Patents', Supreme Court Review, 293-346
John F. Duffy (2008), 'A Timing Approach to Patentability', Lewis and Clark Law Review, 12 (2), 343-74
Robert P. Merges and Richard R. Nelson (1990), 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope', Columbia Law Review, 90 (4), May, 839-916
Suzanne Scotchmer (1991), 'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), Winter, 29-41
Edmund W. Kitch (1977), 'The Nature and Function of the Patent System', Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (2), October, 265-90
John F. Duffy (2004), 'Rethinking the Prospect Theory of Patents', University of Chicago Law Review, 71 (2), Spring, 439-510
Paul J. Heald (2005), 'A Transaction Costs Theory of Patent Law', Ohio State Law Journal, 66 (3), 473-509
Donald S. Chisum (1986), 'The Patentability of Algorithms', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 47, 959-1022
Allen Newell (1986), 'Response: The Models are Broken, the Models are Broken!', University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 47, 1023-35
Thomas F. Cotter (2007), 'A Burkean Perspective on Patent Eligibility', Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 22, 855-96
Bronwyn H. Hall and Rosemarie Ham Ziedonis (2001), 'The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995', RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (1), Spring, 101-28
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey (2004), 'Valuable Patents', Georgetown Law Journal, 92 (3), March, 435-79.
Notes:
The recommended readings are available in the print version, or may be available via the link to your library's holdings.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
1-78536-217-8
OCLC:
495597555

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account