1 option
Pseudo cluster randomization / George F. Borm.
- Format:
- Video
- Author/Creator:
- Borm, George F., author.
- Series:
- Henry Stewart talks.
- Henry Stewart talks
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Clinical trials.
- Physical Description:
- 1 videorecording (41 min., 10 sec.) : sound, color.
- Place of Publication:
- London : Henry Stewart Talks, 2007.
- System Details:
- video file
- Summary:
- Audio-visual presentation : Individual randomization versus cluster randomization ; Contamination as a possible problem with individual randomization ; Possible problems with cluster randomization: selection bias and slow recruitment control arm ; Pseudo cluster randomization as an alternative method: less contamination, less selection bias, better recruitment and statistically efficient ; Formula to calculate power ; Analysis methods.
- Contents:
- Printable Handouts
- Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Trial design
- Types of randomisation (1)
- Types of randomisation (2)
- From individual to cluster randomisation
- Why cluster randomisation?
- Contamination
- Individual vs. cluster randomisation
- EASYcare study - elderly with geriatric problems
- EASYcare study - design
- EASYcare study - individual randomisation?
- EASYcare study - cluster randomisation? (1)
- EASYcare study - cluster randomisation? (2)
- Dilemma
- Solution?
- Pseudo cluster randomisation (rando) (1)
- Pseudo cluster randomisation (rando) (2)
- Addressing EASYcare problems by psedo cluster
- Pseudo cluster rando: less contamination
- Pseudo cluster rando: less selection bias
- Pseudo cluster rando: better recruitment
- Conclusion for EASYcare study
- Efficiency and power of pseudo cluster rando
- Estimators treatment results
- Simple, unweighted mean
- Minimal contamination mean
- Compromise: weighted mean
- Sample size cluster randomisation
- Sample size pseudo cluster randomisation
- D-pseudo cluster (minimal variance approach)
- Sample size EASYcare study
- Cluster randomised design
- Pseudo cluster design
- Individual randomisation
- Sample size comparison
- Efficiency: contamination 20%, cluster size 10
- Efficiency: contamination 20%, cluster size 30
- Efficiency: contamination 40%, cluster size 10
- Efficiency: contamination 40%, cluster size 30
- Conclusion
- Analysis pseudo cluster trial
- Inappropriate methods
- Mixed models
- EASYcare study: variables
- EASYcare study: dataset
- EASYcare study: analysis (1)
- EASYcare study: analysis (2)
- EASYcare study: analysis (3)
- EASYcare study: specify fixed part of model (1)
- EASYcare study: specify fixed part of model (2)
- EASYcare study: specify random part of model (1)
- EASYcare study: specify random part of model (2)
- EASYcare study: request model statistics (1)
- EASYcare study: request model statistics (2)
- Analysis program - SPSS code
- Output: independent variables
- Output: test of fixed effects
- Output: estimates fixed effects (1)
- Output: within and between variance
- Analysis program: SAS code
- Literature.
- Notes:
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Retrieved April 11, 2024, from https://hstalks.com/bs/540/.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.