My Account Log in

1 option

Lessons learned from conducting a rapid review : a case study examining factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening use / Robert S. Kerrison, Christian von Wagner, Alex Ghanouni, Trish Green, Una Macleod, Mark Hughes, Colin J. Rees, Stephen Duffy, Lesley M. McGregor.

SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Kerrison, Robert S., author.
Wagner, Christian von, author.
Ghanouni, Alex, author.
Green, Trish, active 2020, author.
Macleod, Una, author.
Hughes, Mark, active 2020, author.
Rees, Colin, author.
Duffy, Stephen, author.
McGregor, Lesley M., author.
Series:
SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health.
SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Medicine--Research--Methodology--Case studies.
Medicine.
Sigmoidoscopy--Case studies.
Sigmoidoscopy.
Physical Description:
1 online resource.
Place of Publication:
London : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020.
Summary:
Rapid reviews enable researchers to obtain a snapshot of what is known about a topic in a quick and systematic way, and are increasingly becoming an important aspect of the research literature. Despite this, there are currently no formal guidelines as to how best to conduct a rapid review. One method is to begin with a narrow search, and to expand the search successively, until the number of new/additional publications considered potentially eligible, based on title and abstract alone, is less than 1% of the total number of publications found overall (at this point, one can be reasonably confident that expanding the search is unlikely to yield any considerable new information). One of the main advantages of this method is that it provides a rationale for terminating the search at a given point, thereby making it less time-consuming than many other methods, which require the reviewer(s) to screen all articles found in response to a comprehensive list of search terms. In this case study, we describe our experience using the aforementioned method to review the literature investigating factors associated with flexible sigmoidoscopy ("bowel scope") screening use, and the lessons learned from it. We also describe the problems encountered in performing our review, and the steps implemented to overcome them. Finally, we provide suggestions for methodological improvements for the benefit of those considering conducting a rapid review in the future.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on XML content.
ISBN:
1-5297-1816-3
9781529718164
OCLC:
1142442131

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account