4 options
Faith in paper : the ethnohistory and litigation of upper Great Lakes Indian treaties / Charles E. Cleland ; with Bruce R. Greene ... [et al.].
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Cleland, Charles E., 1936-
- Greene, Bruce R., author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Indians of North America--Great Lakes Region (North America)--Treaties--History.
- Indians of North America.
- Indians of North America--Legal status, laws, etc--Great Lakes Region (North America)--History.
- Indians of North America--Land tenure--Great Lakes Region (North America)--History.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (x, 391 p. ) maps ;
- Place of Publication:
- Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c2011.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- Organized around eight of the region's most important treaty lawsuits, the book features detailed descriptions and explanations by each case's lead attorney, some of the best legal minds in their field. These lawsuits include cases on fishery and hunting rights (United States v. Michigan; Lac Courte Oreilles v. Wisconsin [Voigt]; Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Thompson; and Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota); reservation boundaries (Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Michigan; Wisconsin v. Stockbridge Munsee Community and Robert Chicks; and County of Mille Lacs v. Melanie Benjamin et al.); and property tax (Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Naftaly). Faith in Paper is both an invaluable contribution to the scholarship of American Indian law and a rich resource for Native people themselves as they strive to retain or regain rights that have eroded over the years. --Book Jacket.
- During the last quarter of the twentieth century, the native people of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota made numerous complaints that their long-standing treaty agreements with the United States were being totally ignored by their state and local governments. Faith in Paper explores the epic clashes in the federal courts that led, in most cases, not only to the reaffirmation of historic treaty agreements but also to newfound tribal sovereignty. This fascinating story is told through historical narratives describing many of these treaty agreements, the conditions of their negotiations, the different understandings of their content, and their effects on Native people, making Faith in Paper the first comprehensive analysis of treaty making between the United States and indigenous American Indian tribes and providing context in the fields of history, anthropology, and the law. --
- Contents:
- The treaty
- The foundations of treaty making
- The invention of Euro-American and Indian treaty making
- Treaties and American law
- The treaties of 1836 and 1855
- United States v. Michigan / by Bruce R. Greene
- United States v. Michigan / by Marc Slonim
- The treaties of St. Peters (1837) and La Pointe
- Lac Courte Oreilles band v. Wisconsin / by Kathryn L. Tierney
- Milles Lacs band of Chippewa Indians et al. v. State of Minnesota et al. / by Marc Slonim
- The Menominee and the coming of Europeans
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Thompson / by Bruce R. Greene
- The boundary of the Keweenaw Bay Reservation
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Michigan / by Bruce R. Greene
- Factionalism and removal: the Stockbridge and Munsee, 1830-56
- State of Wisconsin v. Stockbridge-Munsee Community and Robert Chicks / by Brian Pierson
- The ethnohistory of the Mille Lacs Reservation boundary
- County of Mille Lacs v. Melanie Benjamin et al. / by Marc Slonim
- The treaties of Detroit, August 2, 1855, and Saginaw, October 18, 1864
- Allotment and land loss on the Keweenaw Bay reservation
- Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Naftaly / by Skip Durocher
- The benefits of reestablished treaties.
- Notes:
- Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 379-384) and index.
- Description based on information from the publisher.
- ISBN:
- 0-472-90551-1
- 1-283-33442-9
- 9786613334428
- 0-472-02849-9
- OCLC:
- 1017611353
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.