1 option
Deterring Russia and Iran Improving Effectiveness and Finding Efficiencies / JEFFREY MARTINI, ANDREW RADIN, ALYSSA DEMUS, KRYSTYNA MARCINEK, DARA MASSICOT, KATHERINE PFROMMER, ASHLEY L. RHOADES, CHANDLER SACHS, KAREN M. SUDKAMP, DAVID E. THALER, DAVID WOODWORTH, SEAN M. ZEIGLER.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Martini, Jeffrey
- Series:
- Research report (Rand Corporation) ; A971-1
- Report ; A971-1
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Deterrence (Strategy).
- Strategic planning--United States.
- Strategic planning.
- National security--United States.
- National security.
- Security, International.
- United States--Military policy.
- United States.
- Russia (Federation)--Military policy.
- Russia (Federation).
- Iran--Military policy.
- Iran.
- Defense Infrastructure.
- China.
- Military Force Planning.
- Military Strategy.
- Rapid Force Deployment.
- Russia.
- Security Cooperation.
- Ukraine.
- Local Subjects:
- Defense Infrastructure.
- China.
- Iran.
- Military Force Planning.
- Military Strategy.
- Rapid Force Deployment.
- Russia.
- Security Cooperation.
- Ukraine.
- Physical Description:
- x, 214 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
- Place of Publication:
- Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2023
- Summary:
- The United States makes significant investments in military activities that are intended to deter Russian and Iranian aggression. These investments have only grown in Europe since 2014, when Russia invaded and subsequently annexed Crimea, and remain substantial in the Middle East despite the overall trend of the United States reducing its forward posture in that theater. The increased importance of deterrence as a military mission raises the question of how the United States can most effectively and efficiently deter Russia and Iran without crowding out investments in its other key military missions--including competing with China in the Indo-Pacific. To support defense planners in crafting effective and efficient deterrence strategies, RAND researchers conducted a multimethod analysis--consisting of a literature review, roundtables with subject-matter experts, quantitative analysis, and a case study of Ukraine--to examine conventional deterrence in two theaters: U.S. European Command (EUCOM) and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Specifically, the researchers assessed the deterrent impacts of three categories of U.S. operations, activities, and investments (OAIs): U.S. forward presence; exercises and short-term deployments, such as bomber task force (BTF) missions; and security cooperation. In this report, the researchers describe their findings and offer recommendations for defense planners. This research was completed before the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. It has not been subsequently revised.
- Contents:
- Chapter One: Introduction
- Chapter Two: Baseline Analysis of Deterrence in EUCOM and CENTCOM
- Chapter Three: Roundtables
- Chapter Four: Quantitative Assessment
- Chapter Five: Case Study of Ukraine
- Chapter Six: Conclusions and Recommendations
- Appendix A: Russian Strategic Interests and Supporting OAIs
- Appendix B: Iranian Strategic Interests and Supporting OAIs.
- Notes:
- Title from PDF document (title page: viewed August 17, 2023)
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 176-214)
- Description based on electronic resource
- ISBN:
- 1977411851
- 9781977411853
- OCLC:
- 1394354601
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.