My Account Log in

2 options

Contesting Medical Confidentiality : Origins of the Debate in the United States, Britain, and Germany / Andreas-Holger Maehle.

De Gruyter University of Chicago Press Complete eBook-Package 2016 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Maehle, Andreas-Holger, Author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Confidential communications--Physicians--History--19th century.
Confidential communications.
Confidential communications--Physicians--History--20th century.
Confidential communications--Physicians--United States--History.
Confidential communications--Physicians--Great Britain--History.
Confidential communications--Physicians--Germany--History.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (172 pages)
Place of Publication:
Chicago : University of Chicago Press, [2016]
Language Note:
In English.
Summary:
Medical confidentiality is an essential cornerstone of effective public health systems, and for centuries societies have struggled to maintain the illusion of absolute privacy. In this age of health databases and increasing connectedness, however, the confidentiality of patient information is rapidly becoming a concern at the forefront of worldwide ethical and political debate. In Contesting Medical Confidentiality, Andreas-Holger Maehle travels back to the origins of this increasingly relevant issue. He offers the first comparative analysis of professional and public debates on medical confidentiality in the United States, Britain, and Germany during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when traditional medical secrecy first came under pressure from demands of disclosure in the name of public health. Maehle structures his study around three representative questions of the time that remain salient today: Do physicians have a privilege to refuse court orders to reveal confidential patient details? Is there a medical duty to report illegal procedures to the authorities? Should doctors breach confidentiality in order to prevent the spread of disease? Considering these debates through a unique historical perspective, Contesting Medical Confidentiality illuminates the ethical issues and potentially grave consequences that continue to stir up public debate.
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
Introduction
Chapter 1. Medical Privilege in Court: Protecting Patient Confidence or Obstructing the Course to Justice?
Chapter 2. Venereal Diseases: The Issue of Private versus Public Interest
Chapter 3. Abortion: Reporting a Crime or Preserving Confidentiality?
General Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Notes
Bibliography
Index
Notes:
Previously issued in print: 2016.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 24. Apr 2020)
ISBN:
9780226404967
022640496X
OCLC:
958937297

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account