My Account Log in

1 option

Is the welfare state justified? / Daniel Shapiro.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Shapiro, Daniel, 1954- author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Welfare state.
Free enterprise.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (xi, 323 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Place of Publication:
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Language Note:
English
Summary:
In this book, Daniel Shapiro argues that the dominant positions in contemporary political philosophy - egalitarianism, positive rights theory, communitarianism, and many forms of liberalism - should converge in a rejection of central welfare state institutions. He examines how major welfare institutions, such as government-financed and -administered retirement pensions, national health insurance, and programs for the needy, actually work. Comparing them to compulsory private insurance and private charities, Shapiro argues that the dominant perspectives in political philosophy mistakenly think that their principles support the welfare state. Instead, egalitarians, positive rights theorists, communitarians, and liberals have misunderstood the implications of their own principles, which in fact support more market-based or libertarian institutional conclusions than they may realize. Shapiro's book is unique in its combination of political philosophy with social science. Its focus is not limited to any particular country; rather it examines welfare states in affluent democracies and their market alternatives.
Contents:
Introduction
Justification in political philosophy
Internal versus external arguments
Clarifying the institutional alternatives
Coming attractions
Central perspectives in political philosophy
Justice, equality, and fairness
Basic rights, liberty and well-being
Community and solidarity
Public justification and epistemic accessibility
Health insurance, part I
The topic's importance
The institutional alternatives
Egalitarianism and NHI
Risks and choices : egalitarian reasons for MHI
Rationing, visibility, and egalitarian outcomes : why market allocation is better
Why the priority view agrees with the egalitarian support of MHI
Health insurance, part II
Basic rights and the right to health care
The content of the right
The grounds of the right to health care
Health care and communitarianism
Public justification, information, and rationing
Conclusion : the reasons for MHI's superiority
Old-age or retirement pensions
Egalitarianism, fairness, and retirement pensions
Positive rights and security
Community, solidarity, and pension systems
Public justification, epistemic accessibility, and the superiority of private pension
Conclusion
Welfare or means-tested benefits, part I
Introduction
Different kinds of state welfare
Nongovernmental aid
Egalitarianism and welfare-state redistribution
Why prioritarianism agrees with egalitarianism about welfare policy
Will private charity be enough?
Welfare or means-tested benefits, part II
The right to welfare
Communitarianism and welfare
Public justification, epistemic accessibility, and welfare
Conclusion : the uncertain choice between state and private conditional aid
The problems with SS and the transition problem
The Cato plan
The Brookings plan
Comparing the two plans
Where things stand.
Notes:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Includes bibliographical references (p. 299-309) and index.
ISBN:
1-107-17779-0
1-280-95987-8
9786610959877
0-511-29674-6
0-511-29599-5
0-511-29442-5
0-511-56897-5
0-511-61912-X
0-511-29520-0
OCLC:
476086973

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account