1 option
Computational models of argument : proceedings of COMMA 2022 / edited by Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications ; v. 353.
- Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications ; 353
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Artificial intelligence--Computer simulation v| Congresses.
- Artificial intelligence.
- Reasoning--Computer simulation--Congresses.
- Reasoning.
- Genre:
- Conference papers and proceedings.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (400 pages)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Amsterdam, Netherlands : IOS Press, Incorporated, 2022.
- Summary:
- This volume, part of the Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications series, explores computational models of argumentation, a multidisciplinary field merging artificial intelligence with disciplines like philosophy, linguistics, formal logic, and social choice theory. It provides a comprehensive overview of theoretical, computational, and application-oriented advancements in argumentation systems, including innovative approaches in explainable AI and machine learning. The book features peer-reviewed research presented at the biennial International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2022), showcasing developments in formal models, implemented systems, and practical applications such as legal reasoning and decision-making. It serves as a resource for researchers, practitioners, and students interested in the intersection of AI and argumentation technologies. Generated by AI.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Title Page
- Preface
- About the Conference
- Invited Talks
- Well, to Be Honest, I Wouldnt Start from Here at All (A Personal View of Complexity in Argumentation After 20 Years)
- Detect - Debunk - Communicate: Combating Misinformation with More Realistic NLP
- Argumentation: From Theory to Practice &
- Back
- Regular Papers
- Generating Contrastive Snippets for Argument Search
- Explainable Logic-Based Argumentation
- Admissibility in Strength-Based Argumentation: Complexity and Algorithms
- A Generalized Notion of Consistency with Applications to Formal Argumentation
- Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription
- Serialisable Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
- Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences
- A Ranking Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Based on Serialisability
- NEXAS: A Visual Tool for Navigating and Exploring Argumentation Solution Spaces
- Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. New Loop Semantics, Overview, Complexity Analysis
- Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
- Rule-PSAT: Relaxing Rule Constraints in Probabilistic Assumption-Based Argumentation
- Composite Argumentation Systems with ML Components
- Automated Reasoning with Epistemic Graphs Using SAT Solvers
- Explaining Change in Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation
- How Complex Is the Strong Admissibility Semantics for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks?
- Just a Matter of Perspective. Intertranslating Expressive Argumentation Formalisms
- On the Impact of Data Selection when Applying Machine Learning in Abstract Argumentation
- Algorithms for Reasoning in a Default Logic Instantiation of Assumption-Based Argumentation
- Value-Based Practical Reasoning: Modal Logic + Argumentation
- On the Complexity of Determining Defeat Relations Consistent with Abstract Argumentation Semantics.
- Stability and Relevance in Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks
- Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts
- Formalising an Aspect of Argument Strength: Degrees of Attackability
- Ordinal Conditional Functions for Abstract Argumentation
- Strongly Accepting Subframeworks: Connecting Abstract and Structured Argumentation
- Reasoning With and About Norms in Logical Argumentation
- Demo Papers
- An Argumentative Explanation of Machine Learning Outcomes
- PyArg for Solving and Explaining Argumentation in Python: Demonstration
- Providing Explanations via the EQR Argument Scheme
- EGNN: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Architecture for Enforcement Heuristics
- ADF-BDD: An ADF Solver Based on Binary Decision Diagrams
- Annotating Very Large Arguments
- CPrAA - A Checker for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation
- COGNICA: Cognitive Argumentation
- probo2: A Benchmark Framework for Argumentation Solvers
- Polemicist: A Dialogical Interface for Exploring Complex Debates
- User-Centric Argument Mining with ArgueMapper and Arguebuf
- Attractor - A Java Library for Gradual Bipolar Argumentation
- Gorgias Cloud: On-line Explainable Argumentation
- Interpretable Machine Learning with Gradual Argumentation Frameworks
- The Skeptic Web Service: Utilising Argument Technologies for Reason-Checking
- ACH-Nav: Argument Navigation Using Techniques for Intelligence Analysis
- Subject Index
- Author Index.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Part of the metadata in this record was created by AI, based on the text of the resource.
- ISBN:
- 1-64368-307-1
- OCLC:
- 1347027288
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.