1 option
Sexual harassment and assault in government agencies / Margaret Brown.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Brown, Margaret, author.
- Series:
- Safety and Risk in Society
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Sexual harassment--Law and legislation.
- Sexual harassment.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (350 pages)
- Place of Publication:
- New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2021]
- Summary:
- With nearly 900,000 federal civilian employees around the world, DOD has responsibilities for preventing and responding to sexual harassment and assault within its workforce. Chapter 1 examines the extent to which DOD has visibility over such reported incidents and has developed and implemented policies and procedures to respond to and resolve these incidents. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has policies to prevent and address sexual harassment in the workplace, but some aspects of the policies and of the complaint processes may hinder those efforts. Chapters 2 and 3 address the extent to which VA has policies to prevent and address sexual harassment, how available data inform VA about sexual harassment, and the extent to which VA provides training to employees on preventing and addressing sexual harassment. The Department of the Interior has a sexual harassment problem. For decades women and men in national parks, refuges, and other public lands and offices have not been given the protections they need to do their work free from harm as reported in chapter 4. The Smithsonian Institution (Smithsonian) is the world's largest museum, education, and research complex, with 19 museums and the National Zoo. An allegation of sexual harassment between two Smithsonian affiliated persons was made public and is discussed in chapter 5. Chapters 6-8 look at how sexual harassment and assault has affected NOAA employees, and how NOAA is trying to address the issue.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Contents
- Preface
- Chapter 1
- Sexual Harassment and Assault: Guidance Needed to Ensure Consistent Tracking, Response, and Training for DOD Civilians(
- Abbreviations
- Why GAO Did This Study
- What GAO Recommends
- What GAO Found
- Background
- Legal Framework for Workplace Sexual Harassment
- Definition of and Roles and Responsibilities for Sexual Harassment Prevention and Response in DOD
- DOD Processes for Reporting, Investigating, and Resolving Sexual Harassment Complaints
- Civilian Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program
- Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) Program
- Command Investigations
- Anti-Harassment Program
- Definition of and Roles and Responsibilities for Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in DOD
- Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO)
- Service Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Programs
- SAPR Support Services and Reporting Options
- Military Justice System
- DOD Has Taken Steps to Track Reports of Sexual Harassment and Assault Involving Federal Civilian Employees, but Several Issues Limit Its Visibility
- DOD Has Taken Steps to Improve Tracking of Sexual Harassment Complaints Involving Federal Civilian Employees, but Several Challenges Limit Its Overall Visibility
- Tracking of EEO Sexual Harassment Complaints
- Tracking of Harassment Allegations Made Outside of the EEO Process
- Military Services' Tracking of Informal MEO Complaints of Sexual Harassment
- Limited Guidance on Tracking Reported Sexual Assaults Involving Federal Civilian Employees Hinders DOD's Visibility over Such Incidents Department-Wide
- Military Departments' Tracking of Sexual Assaults Involving DOD Federal Civilian Employees
- Other DOD Components' Tracking of Sexual Assaults Involving Federal Civilian Employees.
- Tracking Federal Civilian Employment Status in Reported Sexual Assaults
- Not All DOD Components Have Access to the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database
- DOD Has Taken Steps to Estimate Sexual Harassment and Assault Prevalence among Its Federal Civilian Workforce, but Results Are Not Widely Distributed
- Gaps Exist in DOD's Response to and Resolution of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Incidents Involving Federal Civilian Employees
- DOD Has Issued Guidance to Respond to Allegations of Sexual Harassment by Federal Civilian Employees, but It Does Not Comprehensively Address All Mechanisms for Resolution
- Structure of Anti-Harassment Programs
- DOD Federal Civilian Employee Eligibility for Command Investigations
- Sexual Assault Support Services Depend on the Victim's Eligibility, and Availability of Services for DOD Federal Civilian Employees Is Inconsistent across the Department
- DOD Federal Civilian Employee Eligibility for Sexual Assault Support Services
- DOD Component Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Programs
- Availability of Legal Services for DOD Federal Civilian Employees
- Reporting Options for Federal Civilian Employees Are Inconsistent across DOD
- Service Exceptions to Allow Federal Civilian Restricted Reporting Are Inconsistent
- All Services Allow Unrestricted Reporting for Federal Civilian Employees outside the Continental United States
- Notification Responsibilities of SAPR Personnel Following a Disclosure of Work-Related Sexual Assault Are Unclear
- Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts for DOD Federal Civilian Employees Are Primarily Focused on Training and Vary across the Department
- Provision and Content of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training Vary across the Department.
- DOD Federal Civilian Employees Receive Sexual Harassment Training, but Frequency and Content Vary
- DOD Provides Sexual Assault Training to Some Federal Civilian Employees, but Inclusion of Leading Practices Varies
- DOD Has Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts, but Lacks Comprehensive Strategies Specific to Federal Civilian Employees
- Conclusion
- Recommendations for Executive Action
- Agency Comments and Our Evaluation
- List of Committees
- Appendix I: Scope and Methodology
- Methods Used to Assess Visibility over Reported Incidents
- EEO Sexual Harassment Data
- MEO Sexual Harassment Data
- Reported Sexual Assault Data
- Military Criminal Investigative Organization Sexual Assault Data
- Tracking Reported Incidents of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault
- Methods Used to Assess Development and Implementation of Policies and Procedures to Respond to and Resolve Incidents
- Data Related to Support Services for Civilian Employees
- Methods Used to Assess Establishment of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training
- GAO-Identified Leading Practices for Sexual Harassment Training
- GAO-Identified Leading Practices for Sexual Assault Training
- Evaluation of Training Materials
- Other Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts
- Appendix II: Characteristics of Equal Employment Opportunity Complaints, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
- Appendix III: Sexual Assault Support Service Staffing Levels, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
- Appendix IV: Characteristics of Military Equal Opportunity Sexual Harassment Complaints, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
- Appendix V: Characteristics of Sexual Assaults Involving Department of Defense Civilian Employees, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
- Appendix VI: GAO-Identified Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training.
- Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Harassment Training
- Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Assault Training
- Appendix VII: Comments from the Department of Defense
- Chapter 2
- Sexual Harassment: Inconsistent and Incomplete Policies and Information Hinder VA's Efforts to Protect Employees(
- Title VII and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Requirements
- VA's Organizational Structure for Preventing and Addressing Sexual Harassment
- VA's Methods to Address Sexual Harassment
- Management Process
- Harassment Prevention Program (HPP)
- Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Process
- VA Has Policies to Prevent and Address Sexual Harassment, but VA's EEO Organizational Structures are Misaligned and Key Policies Are Not Formalized
- VA's EEO Organizational Structures Do Not Adhere to a Key EEOC Directive or VA's Agency Policy
- EEO Director
- EEO Program Managers
- Outdated and Inconsistent Policies and Information May Create Confusion
- Harassment Prevention Program's Lack of Formal Policy Could Hinder its Effectiveness
- VA Lacks Comprehensive Information on Sexual Harassment Prevalence and on Any Related Corrective Actions Taken
- VA's Use of Sexual Harassment Data Has Key Limitations
- VA Does Not Fully Track Corrective Actions in Response to Sexual Harassment Findings
- VA Provides Limited Training on Sexual Harassment to Its Employees
- List of Requesters
- Appendix I: Additional Information on Selected Methodologies
- SemiStructured Interviews with VA Officials
- Analysis of VA's EEO and HPP Data and Case Files
- Analysis of MSPB Data
- Key Variables Analyzed.
- MSPB Reliability and Nonresponse Bias Analysis
- Selected 2016 MSPB Survey Questions
- Appendix II: Analysis of Merit Systems Protection Board Survey Data
- Characteristics of Sexual Harassment Experiences at VA
- Information on Types of Sexual Harassment Behaviors
- Information on Alleged Harassers
- Actions Taken by Those Who Experienced Sexual Harassment
- Employee Perceptions of Sexual Harassment at VA
- Comparison of Sexual Harassment across Federal Agencies
- Appendix III: VA Data on Equal Employment Opportunity Program and Harassment Prevention Program Cases
- Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program Data
- Harassment Prevention Program (HPP) Data
- Appendix IV: Comments from the Department of Veterans Affairs
- Chapter 3
- Sexual Harassment VA: Needs to Better Protect Employees(
- VA's EEO Organizational Structures Are Misaligned and Key Policies Are Not Formalized
- Misalignment of EEO Director Position
- Misalignment of EEO Program Manager Positions
- Incomplete or Outdated Policies and Information
- Delayed Finalization of HPP
- VA Lacks Comprehensive Information on Sexual Harassment Prevalence and on Corrective Actions Taken
- Limitations in Use of Sexual Harassment Data
- Incomplete Tracking of Corrective Actions
- Chapter 4
- Sexual Harassment at the Department of the Interior (
- Statement of the Hon. Debbie Dingell, a Representative in Congress from the State of Michigan
- Statement of the Hon. Louie Gohmert, a Representative in Congress from the State of Texas
- Statement of Mark Greenblatt, Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
- Prepared Statement of Mark Lee Greenblatt, Inspector General, Department of the Interior.
- Questions Submitted for the Record to Mark Greenblatt, Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Interior.
- Notes:
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 1-5361-9591-X
- OCLC:
- 1250090640
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.