My Account Log in

1 option

Sexual harassment and assault in government agencies / Margaret Brown.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Brown, Margaret, author.
Series:
Safety and Risk in Society
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Sexual harassment--Law and legislation.
Sexual harassment.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (350 pages)
Place of Publication:
New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2021]
Summary:
With nearly 900,000 federal civilian employees around the world, DOD has responsibilities for preventing and responding to sexual harassment and assault within its workforce. Chapter 1 examines the extent to which DOD has visibility over such reported incidents and has developed and implemented policies and procedures to respond to and resolve these incidents. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has policies to prevent and address sexual harassment in the workplace, but some aspects of the policies and of the complaint processes may hinder those efforts. Chapters 2 and 3 address the extent to which VA has policies to prevent and address sexual harassment, how available data inform VA about sexual harassment, and the extent to which VA provides training to employees on preventing and addressing sexual harassment. The Department of the Interior has a sexual harassment problem. For decades women and men in national parks, refuges, and other public lands and offices have not been given the protections they need to do their work free from harm as reported in chapter 4. The Smithsonian Institution (Smithsonian) is the world's largest museum, education, and research complex, with 19 museums and the National Zoo. An allegation of sexual harassment between two Smithsonian affiliated persons was made public and is discussed in chapter 5. Chapters 6-8 look at how sexual harassment and assault has affected NOAA employees, and how NOAA is trying to address the issue.
Contents:
Intro
Contents
Preface
Chapter 1
Sexual Harassment and Assault: Guidance Needed to Ensure Consistent Tracking, Response, and Training for DOD Civilians(
Abbreviations
Why GAO Did This Study
What GAO Recommends
What GAO Found
Background
Legal Framework for Workplace Sexual Harassment
Definition of and Roles and Responsibilities for Sexual Harassment Prevention and Response in DOD
DOD Processes for Reporting, Investigating, and Resolving Sexual Harassment Complaints
Civilian Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program
Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) Program
Command Investigations
Anti-Harassment Program
Definition of and Roles and Responsibilities for Sexual Assault Prevention and Response in DOD
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office (SAPRO)
Service Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Programs
SAPR Support Services and Reporting Options
Military Justice System
DOD Has Taken Steps to Track Reports of Sexual Harassment and Assault Involving Federal Civilian Employees, but Several Issues Limit Its Visibility
DOD Has Taken Steps to Improve Tracking of Sexual Harassment Complaints Involving Federal Civilian Employees, but Several Challenges Limit Its Overall Visibility
Tracking of EEO Sexual Harassment Complaints
Tracking of Harassment Allegations Made Outside of the EEO Process
Military Services' Tracking of Informal MEO Complaints of Sexual Harassment
Limited Guidance on Tracking Reported Sexual Assaults Involving Federal Civilian Employees Hinders DOD's Visibility over Such Incidents Department-Wide
Military Departments' Tracking of Sexual Assaults Involving DOD Federal Civilian Employees
Other DOD Components' Tracking of Sexual Assaults Involving Federal Civilian Employees.
Tracking Federal Civilian Employment Status in Reported Sexual Assaults
Not All DOD Components Have Access to the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database
DOD Has Taken Steps to Estimate Sexual Harassment and Assault Prevalence among Its Federal Civilian Workforce, but Results Are Not Widely Distributed
Gaps Exist in DOD's Response to and Resolution of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Incidents Involving Federal Civilian Employees
DOD Has Issued Guidance to Respond to Allegations of Sexual Harassment by Federal Civilian Employees, but It Does Not Comprehensively Address All Mechanisms for Resolution
Structure of Anti-Harassment Programs
DOD Federal Civilian Employee Eligibility for Command Investigations
Sexual Assault Support Services Depend on the Victim's Eligibility, and Availability of Services for DOD Federal Civilian Employees Is Inconsistent across the Department
DOD Federal Civilian Employee Eligibility for Sexual Assault Support Services
DOD Component Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Programs
Availability of Legal Services for DOD Federal Civilian Employees
Reporting Options for Federal Civilian Employees Are Inconsistent across DOD
Service Exceptions to Allow Federal Civilian Restricted Reporting Are Inconsistent
All Services Allow Unrestricted Reporting for Federal Civilian Employees outside the Continental United States
Notification Responsibilities of SAPR Personnel Following a Disclosure of Work-Related Sexual Assault Are Unclear
Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts for DOD Federal Civilian Employees Are Primarily Focused on Training and Vary across the Department
Provision and Content of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training Vary across the Department.
DOD Federal Civilian Employees Receive Sexual Harassment Training, but Frequency and Content Vary
DOD Provides Sexual Assault Training to Some Federal Civilian Employees, but Inclusion of Leading Practices Varies
DOD Has Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts, but Lacks Comprehensive Strategies Specific to Federal Civilian Employees
Conclusion
Recommendations for Executive Action
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation
List of Committees
Appendix I: Scope and Methodology
Methods Used to Assess Visibility over Reported Incidents
EEO Sexual Harassment Data
MEO Sexual Harassment Data
Reported Sexual Assault Data
Military Criminal Investigative Organization Sexual Assault Data
Tracking Reported Incidents of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault
Methods Used to Assess Development and Implementation of Policies and Procedures to Respond to and Resolve Incidents
Data Related to Support Services for Civilian Employees
Methods Used to Assess Establishment of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training
GAO-Identified Leading Practices for Sexual Harassment Training
GAO-Identified Leading Practices for Sexual Assault Training
Evaluation of Training Materials
Other Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention Efforts
Appendix II: Characteristics of Equal Employment Opportunity Complaints, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
Appendix III: Sexual Assault Support Service Staffing Levels, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
Appendix IV: Characteristics of Military Equal Opportunity Sexual Harassment Complaints, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
Appendix V: Characteristics of Sexual Assaults Involving Department of Defense Civilian Employees, Fiscal Years 2015-2019
Appendix VI: GAO-Identified Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Training.
Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Harassment Training
Leading Practices and Required Elements for Sexual Assault Training
Appendix VII: Comments from the Department of Defense
Chapter 2
Sexual Harassment: Inconsistent and Incomplete Policies and Information Hinder VA's Efforts to Protect Employees(
Title VII and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Requirements
VA's Organizational Structure for Preventing and Addressing Sexual Harassment
VA's Methods to Address Sexual Harassment
Management Process
Harassment Prevention Program (HPP)
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Process
VA Has Policies to Prevent and Address Sexual Harassment, but VA's EEO Organizational Structures are Misaligned and Key Policies Are Not Formalized
VA's EEO Organizational Structures Do Not Adhere to a Key EEOC Directive or VA's Agency Policy
EEO Director
EEO Program Managers
Outdated and Inconsistent Policies and Information May Create Confusion
Harassment Prevention Program's Lack of Formal Policy Could Hinder its Effectiveness
VA Lacks Comprehensive Information on Sexual Harassment Prevalence and on Any Related Corrective Actions Taken
VA's Use of Sexual Harassment Data Has Key Limitations
VA Does Not Fully Track Corrective Actions in Response to Sexual Harassment Findings
VA Provides Limited Training on Sexual Harassment to Its Employees
List of Requesters
Appendix I: Additional Information on Selected Methodologies
Semi­Structured Interviews with VA Officials
Analysis of VA's EEO and HPP Data and Case Files
Analysis of MSPB Data
Key Variables Analyzed.
MSPB Reliability and Nonresponse Bias Analysis
Selected 2016 MSPB Survey Questions
Appendix II: Analysis of Merit Systems Protection Board Survey Data
Characteristics of Sexual Harassment Experiences at VA
Information on Types of Sexual Harassment Behaviors
Information on Alleged Harassers
Actions Taken by Those Who Experienced Sexual Harassment
Employee Perceptions of Sexual Harassment at VA
Comparison of Sexual Harassment across Federal Agencies
Appendix III: VA Data on Equal Employment Opportunity Program and Harassment Prevention Program Cases
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program Data
Harassment Prevention Program (HPP) Data
Appendix IV: Comments from the Department of Veterans Affairs
Chapter 3
Sexual Harassment VA: Needs to Better Protect Employees(
VA's EEO Organizational Structures Are Misaligned and Key Policies Are Not Formalized
Misalignment of EEO Director Position
Misalignment of EEO Program Manager Positions
Incomplete or Outdated Policies and Information
Delayed Finalization of HPP
VA Lacks Comprehensive Information on Sexual Harassment Prevalence and on Corrective Actions Taken
Limitations in Use of Sexual Harassment Data
Incomplete Tracking of Corrective Actions
Chapter 4
Sexual Harassment at the Department of the Interior (
Statement of the Hon. Debbie Dingell, a Representative in Congress from the State of Michigan
Statement of the Hon. Louie Gohmert, a Representative in Congress from the State of Texas
Statement of Mark Greenblatt, Inspector General, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
Prepared Statement of Mark Lee Greenblatt, Inspector General, Department of the Interior.
Questions Submitted for the Record to Mark Greenblatt, Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Interior.
Notes:
Description based on print version record.
ISBN:
1-5361-9591-X
OCLC:
1250090640

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account