My Account Log in

1 option

Deus ut tentus vel visus : die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt (ca. 1293-1320) / von Thomas Jeschke.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Jeschke, Thomas.
Series:
Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 104.
Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters ; Bd. 104
Language:
German
Subjects (All):
God (Christianity)--Knowableness--History of doctrines--Middle Ages, 600-1500.
God (Christianity).
Holiness--Catholic Church--History of doctrines--Middle Ages, 600-1500.
Holiness.
Durandus, of Saint-Pourcain, Bishop of Meaux, ca. 1275-1334.
Durandus.
John, of Paris, 1240?-1306.
John.
Baconthorpe, John, d. 1346. Sentences commentary.
Baconthorpe, John.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (880 p.)
Place of Publication:
Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2011.
Language Note:
German
Summary:
In his Sentences Commentary (published circa 1320), the Carmelite John Baconthorp discusses the question of whether beatitude is a reflexive act. He refers to John of Paris’s view in which beatitude is an act of knowing that we possess God and Durandus of St. Pourçain’s view that it is knowing that we know God. The object of the first is God as possessed (Deus ut tentus) and the second is God as known ( Deus ut visus ). Taking Baconthorp’s account as a starting point, the present study adopts a threefold approach: First it analyzes Baconthorp’s text on its own terms. Next it reconstructs the 13th/14th-century debate on the basis of the original sources. Finally it compares Baconthorp’s narration with the historical positions, drawing further conclusions about Baconthorp’s specific methodology.
Contents:
Preliminary Material
Einführung
Kapitel I. Die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt bei Johannes Baconthorp
Kapitel II. Die These des Johannes von Paris als Ausgangspunkt der Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt
Kapitel III. Die Kritik an der These des Johannes von Paris
Kapitel IV. Die These des Durandus von St. Pourçain als zweiter Teil der Debatte
Kapitel V. Die Kritik an den Thesen des Durandus
Kapitel VI. Die Erzählung des Johannes Baconthorp und die historische Debatte
Einleitung zu den Editionstexten
Appendix A. Johannes Baconthorp, In primum Sententiarum, d. 1, q. 1, a. 1–2
Appendix B. Johannes Quidort von Paris, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49
Appendix C. Petrus von Auvergne, Quodlibet primum, q. 7
Appendix D. Herveus Natalis, Quaestiones disputatae de beatitudine, q. 4
Appendix E. Johannes von Pouilly, Quodlibet quintum, q. 7
Appendix F. Durandus von St. Pourçain, In quartum Sententiarum (A/B), d. 49, q. 5
Appendix G. Petrus de Palude, In primum Sententiarum, d. 1, q. 1 und q. 3
Appendix H. Petrus de Palude, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49, q. 4
Appendix I. Johannes von Neapel, Quodlibet sextum, q. 15
Appendix K. Petrus Aureoli, In quartum Sententiarum, d. 49, q. 3–5
Verzeichnis der Quellen und der Literatur
Namenregister
Sachregister.
Notes:
Originally presented as the author's thesis--Universität zu Köln and Universita del Salento, Lecce, 2009.
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
ISBN:
1-283-85216-0
90-04-19188-7
OCLC:
821178639
Publisher Number:
10.1163/9789004191884 DOI

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account