My Account Log in

4 options

Ballot Blocked : The Political Erosion of the Voting Rights Act / Jesse H. Rhodes.

De Gruyter Stanford University Press Complete eBook-Package 2017 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central University Press Available online

View online

Ebscohost Ebooks University Press Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Rhodes, Jesse H., Author.
Series:
Stanford studies in law and politics.
Stanford Studies in Law and Politics
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Voting Rights Act of 1965.
United States.
Suffrage--United States--History--20th century.
Suffrage.
Suffrage--United States--History--21st century.
Minorities--Suffrage--United States--History--20th century.
Minorities.
Minorities--Suffrage--United States--History--21st century.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (278 pages).
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press, [2020]
Language Note:
In English.
Summary:
Voting rights are a perennial topic in American politics. Recent elections and the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down key enforcement provisions in the Voting Rights Act (VRA), have only placed further emphasis on the debate over voter disenfranchaisement. Over the past five decades, both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have consistently voted to expand the protections offered to vulnerable voters by the Voting Rights Act. And yet, the administration of the VRA has become more fragmented and judicial interpretation of its terms has become much less generous. Why have Republicans consistently adopted administrative and judicial decisions that undermine legislation they repeatedly endorse? Ballot Blocked shows how the divergent trajectories of legislation, administration, and judicial interpretation in voting rights policymaking derive largely from efforts by conservative politicians to narrow the scope of federal enforcement while at the same time preserving their public reputations as supporters of racial equality and minority voting rights. Jesse H. Rhodes argues that conservatives adopt a paradoxical strategy in which they acquiesce to expansive voting rights protections in Congress (where decisions are visible and easily traceable) while simultaneously narrowing the scope of federal enforcement via administrative and judicial maneuvers (which are less visible and harder to trace). Over time, the repeated execution of this strategy has enabled a conservative Supreme Court to exercise preponderant influence over the scope of federal enforcement.
Contents:
Frontmatter
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction. Explaining the Puzzling Evolution of the Voting Rights Act
1. Liberal Ascendance and Enactment of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
2. Conservative Backlash and Partisan Struggle over Voting Rights, 1968–1980
3. The Growing Struggle over Voting Rights in the 1980s and 1990s
4. Voting Rights Politics in an Era of Conservative Ascendance, 2001–2013
5. Voting Rights Politics in the Age of Obama, 2009–2016
Conclusion. Partisan Interests, Institutional Conflict, and the Future of the Voting Rights Struggle
Notes
Index
Notes:
Includes index.
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 23. Jul 2020)
ISBN:
9781503603530
1503603539
OCLC:
1178769508

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account