My Account Log in

3 options

Argumentation in political deliberation / edited by Marcin Lewinski ; Dima Mohammed, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

EBSCOhost eBook Community College Collection Available online

View online

Ebook Central College Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Lewinski, Marcin, editor.
Mohammed, Dima, editor.
Series:
Benjamins Current Topics
Benjamins current topics, 1874-0081 ; 76
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Persuasion (Rhetoric)--Political aspects.
Persuasion (Rhetoric).
Discourse analysis--Political aspects.
Discourse analysis.
Mass media--Political aspects.
Mass media.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (184 p.)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]
Language Note:
English
Summary:
Dialectical approaches traditionally conceptualize argumentation as a discussion in which two parties debate on "two sides of an issue" (pro and con). However, many political issues engender multiple positions. This is clear in multi-party online deliberations in which often an array of competing positions is debated in one and the same discussion. A proponent of a given position thus addresses a number of possible opponents, who in turn may hold incompatible opinions. The goal of this chapter is to shed extra light on such "polylogical" clash of opinions in online deliberation, by examining t
Contents:
Argumentation in Political Deliberation; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Argumentation in political deliberation; 1. Argumentation theory and political deliberation; 2. Overview of the volume; Acknowledgements; References; Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation; 1. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse; 2. Conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types; 3. Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering; 4. Pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain
ReferencesStrategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate; 1. Introduction; 2. Plenary debate in the European Parliament; 3. Preliminary observations concerning strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate; 4. Conclusion; References; Pursuing multiple goals in European Parliamentary Debates; 1. Introduction; 2. Debating the EU response to "exceptional migratory flows"; 3. The standpoints and the arguments advanced; 4. The goals pursued by the MEPs; 5. Theoretical implications; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References
The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation1. Introduction; 2. Two methods of public deliberation; 2.1 Consensus conference; French consensus conference on nanotechnology; 2.2 Public hearing; The public hearing on nanotechnology; 2.3 Public participation vs. public communication types of deliberation; 3. Defining public deliberation within argumentation studies; 4. Counter discourse in the two methods of public deliberation; 4.1 Counter discourse in the consensus conference; 4.2 Counter discourse in the public hearing; 5. Concluding remarks; Acknowledgements
ReferencesDeliberation digitized; 1. Introduction; 2. Argument and disagreement management; 2.1 Reconsidering argument activities; 2.2 Disagreement management; 2.3 Argument and felicity's condition; 3. Designing disagreement space; 3.1 Communication design work and designs for communication; 3.2 Practical theories and responsibilities for interaction; 3.3 Argument, technology, deliberation; 4. Conclusion; References; (How) do participants in online discussion forums create 'echo chambers'?; 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical and empirical exploration
3. Political online forums as argumentative communities4. Research design; The online forum Climategate.nl; Data selection; Method of analysis; 5. Analysis; Fragment A: 8-12 December 2009; Fragment B: 17 January-3 February 2010; Fragment C: 14-21 June 2010; Fragment D: 18-21 April 2011; Fragment E: 27 April-2 May 2011; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation; 1. Introduction; 2. Bin Laden is dead and what now; 3. Participants in online deliberation; 4. Sides, positions, cases, and parties in argumentation; 5. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Notes:
Description based upon print version of record.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher.
ISBN:
9789027268273
9027268274
OCLC:
907931390

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account