2 options
Competition for prisons : public or private? / Julian Le Vay.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Le Vay, Julian, author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Prisons--Great Britain--History--20th century.
- Prisons.
- Prisons--Great Britain--History--21st century.
- Prisons--Privatization--Great Britain.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xiv, 304 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
- Place of Publication:
- Bristol : Policy Press, 2016.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- This book re-assesses the benefits and failures of competition, how public and private prisons compare, the impact of competition on the public sector's performance, and how well government has managed this 'quasi-market'.
- Contents:
- COMPETITION FOR PRISONS; Contents; List of tables and figures; Tables; Figures; List of acronyms; Preface; 1. Origins; Prologue; The state of the prisons; Preparing the ground; The route to legislation; 2. Evolution; 1992-97: establishing a viable market; 1997-2000: Labour and the PFI boom; The 2000s: drift and indecision; 2010-15: Coalition government: the end of competition?; 3. Related markets: immigration - two sectors, no competition; A strange silence; Development of the immigration detention estate; A perfect market?; Comparing sectors; Conclusion; 4. Youth custody; Background
- 1993-97 Conservative government and Secure Training Centres1997 onwards: Labour, expansion of the private sector and creation of the Youth Justice Board; Managing rising, then falling, demand; 2010 Coalition government; Competition?; Conclusion; 5. Related markets: electronic monitoring - fall of the giants; The fall; What did the contractors do wrong?; Why did they behave like this?; Impact; The untold half of the story; Why are these questions not being asked?; Non-barking watchdogs; So who is to blame?; 6. The quasi-market: characteristics and operation; Quasi-markets in public services
- Scope and size of the quasi-marketThe customer; Government's dual role: customer and competitor; Private sector view of government as customer; The private sector suppliers; Operation of the quasi-market; Conclusions; 7. Comparing public and contracted prisons; 8. Comparing quality of service; Methodological and data issues; Home Office studies of four 'management only' contracted prisons; National Audit Office study of the operational performance of PFI prisons; HM Inspectorate ratings; Statistical analysis by HMIP (2009); NOMS Prison Rating System (PRS); The Cambridge research
- Comparison of quality at male local prisonsPrisons in trouble; Financial penalties; Conclusions; Four prisons in trouble; 9. Costing the uncostable? Civil Service pensions; The elephant in the room; The question; The Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme; Benchmarks; Does it really matter?; Conclusions; 10. Costing the uncostable? PFI; PFI in prisons; Criticisms of PSCs; Length of PFI contracts and value for money; Comparison with PFI in other services; The Mouchel study; Thameside PFI; The end of PFI; Conclusions; 11. Comparing cost; Some general issues about comparing costs
- 'Management only' contracts (new builds)Market tests; PFIs versus PSCs: the data; Construction: cost and speed; Structure of the difference in operational cost between sectors; Cost versus quality; Can the public sector match private sector costs?; Conclusions; 12. Impact of competition on the public sector; 1990: the Prison Service as basket case; Extent of improvement 1990-2010; What drove this improvement?; Scotland revisited; Innovation; Innovation in the contracted sector; Innovation in the public sector; Barriers to innovation; Conclusions; 13. Objections of principle
- Bad in principle, or bad in practice?
- Notes:
- Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 01 Sep 2022).
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 9781447313243
- 1447313240
- 9781447313236
- 1447313232
- OCLC:
- 964355950
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.