Data rights relevant to weapon systems in Air Force Special Operations Command / Frank Camm [and eight others].

Format:

• Book

Author/Creator:

• Camm, Frank A., 1949- author.

Contributor:

• Project Air Force (U.S.)

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

• Airplanes, Military--Modification--United States.
• Airplanes, Military--Electronic equipment--United States.
• Intellectual property--United States.
• Airplanes, Military--Modification.
• Armed Forces--Procurement--Evaluation.
• Intellectual property.
• United States.
• United States. Air Force--Procurement--Evaluation.
• United States. Air Force Special Operations Command.
• United States. Air Force.

Place of Publication:

Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Corporation 2021

Summary:

The small fleets of specialized aircraft operated by Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) need to be modified quickly to address new threats as they arise. To do this, AFSOC depends heavily on the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of its core military aircraft assets and their subsystems for life-cycle support. But AFSOC has grown dissatisfied with the support it is getting from the OEMs in terms of technical data. AFSOC believes that better access to technical data could improve competition for sustainment services or enable the U.S. Air Force to establish organic maintenance capabilities. To make use of a contractor's technical data, the U.S. government must satisfy two conditions. First, the government must have the appropriate license rights. Standardized data rights are based on the source of funding used to create the data. Second, the government must actually possess the data it seeks to use. Securing the data themselves is as important—if not more so—as having the appropriate data rights. In the programs the authors examined, they found limited understanding of the role of data rights and deliverables. In some cases, government personnel inappropriately acceded to contractor claims about what rights the government could acquire. In others, personnel acquired the appropriate data rights but failed to list technical data as deliverables or failed to take delivery of technical data before relevant contract authority expired. Still in other cases there were disputes between the government and contractors over rights. Lack of access to relevant technical data complicated these programs' abilities to sustain their weapon systems.

Contents:

• Chapter One: Introduction
• Chapter Two: Broad Factors Affecting AFSOC's Interest in Technical Data
• Chapter Three: Data Rights in the Air Force Today
• Chapter Four: Three Tools to Help Manage Technical Data
• Chapter Five: Three Potential New Contracting Strategies
• Chapter Six: What Should the Air Force Pay for Technical Data?
• Chapter Seven: Findings and Recommendations
• Appendix A: A Legal Primer on the Use of Technical Data and Data Rights in a Defense Setting
• Appendix B: Background Information on Five Case Studies.