Influences on the adoption of multifactor authentication / Martin C. Libicki [et al.].

Format:

Book

Contributor:

National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.)

RAND Homeland Security and Defense Center.

Libicki, Martin C.

Series:

Technical report (Rand Corporation).

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Computers--Access control.

Computers.

Computer security--Management.

Computer security.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (xv, 45 pages)

Place of Publication:

Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corporation, 2011.

Summary:

Passwords are presently the primary method by which users authenticate themselves to computer systems. But passwords are proving less and less capable of protecting systems from abuse. Multifactor authentication (MFA)⁰́₄which combines something you know (e.g., a PIN), something you have (e.g., a token), and/or something you are (e.g., a fingerprint)⁰́₄is increasingly being required. This report investigates why organizations choose to adopt or not adopt MFA⁰́₄and where they choose to use it. The authors reviewed the academic literature and articles in the trade press and conducted structured conversations with selected organizations that use or have contemplated using MFA. They found that the type of organization⁰́₄for example, defense contractor, bank, hospital⁰́₄affected its MFA choices. MFA is mandated for U.S. government agencies, which tend to use PINs and tokens for remote access. Among private users of MFA, tokens that generate one-time passwords, rather than biometrics, predominate. The researchers recommend that the U.S. government develop methodologies by which the costs and benefits of mandating MFA can be evaluated. Guidance by the National Institute of Standards to government agencies may be useful in helping them sort out the various arguments for and against mandating MFA in a given sector.

Contents:

Introduction Lessons from the Literature Insights from Interviews Policy Considerations Appendix: Literature Review for Authentication Technologies