My Account Log in

1 option

Improving U.S. military accession medical screening systems / Maria C. Lytell, Kimberly Curry Hall, Nelson Lim.

RAND Reports Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Lytell, Maria C., 1979- author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Medical screening--United States.
Medical screening.
Armed Forces--Medical examinations.
Armed Forces.
United States--Armed Forces--Medical examinations.
United States.
United States--Armed Forces--Recruiting, enlistment, etc.
United States--Armed Forces--Recruiting, enlistment, etc--Evaluation.
United States. Military Entrance Processing Command.
United States. Department of Defense. Medical Examination Review Board.
Place of Publication:
Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Corporation 2019
Summary:
Responsibility for medically screening enlisted and officer applicants for the armed forces falls on two Department of Defense (DoD) organizations: the U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command (USMEPCOM), which screens mainly enlisted applicants at military entrance processing stations (MEPS) throughout the country; and the Department of Defense Medical Examination Review Board (DoDMERB), which contracts with civilian health care providers to screen officer applicants. Given the inconsistencies and inefficiencies of the two systems, the project team was tasked with exploring how best to reform the medical screening process. After conducting interviews, focus groups, and a workshop with key stakeholders; reviewing documentation on current policies and practices; and examining prior DoD efforts at improvement, the team developed three main courses of action (COAs) to reform the business models used for accession medical screening, considered the potential feasibility of implementing each COA, and identified the COA for a hybrid model of the two systems as presenting the least amount of risk while allowing for simultaneous testing of enlisted and officer applicants across the two systems. Because of the potential for major impacts of implementing the hybrid model COA, the team recommended that DoD conduct a pilot program involving a randomized control trial at four experimental sites in the United States. The program incorporates strategic elements of an accession medical screening system (regardless of business model) described by stakeholders, as well as findings from analyses of organizational and geographic-based features using a RAND-developed geographic information system tool.
Contents:
Introduction
Overview of Accession Medical Screening Systems, Their Potential Challenges, and Their Relative Advantages and Disadvantages
Department of Defense and Service Efforts to Improve Accession Medical Screening Processes
Courses of Action for Business Model Changes to Accession Medical Screening Systems
Designing Pilot Programs to Assess Course of Action Outcomes
Conclusions
Appendix A: Focus Group and Interview Methodology
Appendix B: Design Workshop Methodology
Appendix C: Logic Model for Accession Medical Screening System
Appendix D: Theoretical Background of Cluster Analysis.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account