My Account Log in

1 option

Performance management and assessment of federally funded research and development centers : lessons from academic literature and practitioner guidance / Victoria A. Greenfield, Sandra Kay Evans, Laura Werber, Samantha Cherney, Lisa Pelled Colabella.

RAND Reports Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Greenfield, Victoria A., 1964- author.
Evans, Sandra Kay, author.
Werber, Laura, author.
Cherney, Samantha, author.
Colabella, Lisa, author.
Contributor:
United States. Department of the Air Force.
Project Air Force (U.S.). Resource Management Program.
Rand Corporation.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Research and development contracts, Government--United States--Evaluation.
Research and development contracts, Government.
Research and development contracts, Government--Evaluation.
United States.
United States. Department of the Air Force--Personnel management--Research.
United States. Department of the Air Force.
Other Title:
Performance Management and Assessment of Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
Place of Publication:
Santa Monica, Calif. RAND Corporation 2022
Summary:
Many U.S. government agencies rely on nonprofit federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) for independent expertise in systems engineering and integration, study and analysis, and research and development. In this report, the authors discuss insights drawn from academic literature and practitioner guidance that are applicable to the effective oversight, management, and performance assessment of FFRDCs. They identify (1) institutional prerequisites for enabling effective oversight, management, and performance assessment of FFRDCs and (2) operational criteria for running constructive assessment processes. Whereas academics and practitioners have written volumes on internal assessment — when an organization examines its own programs and employees — and commercial acquisitions, they have had comparatively little to say about relationships involving FFRDCs. However, research on performance management systems and related or subsidiary processes, including performance reviews and program evaluation, is broadly applicable to government oversight of and engagement with FFRDCs. Thus, the authors examine a wide range of literature and guidance on performance management and program evaluation, looking for best practices in other potentially analogous and relevant organizational contexts, modifying and supplementing the processes as needed to account for contextual differences and other needs.
Contents:
Chapter One: Background
Chapter Two: Institutional Prerequisites for Effective Performance Management
Chapter Three: Operational Criteria for an Effective Performance Assessment Process
Chapter Four: Potential Weaknesses of Performance Management Systems and Assessment Processes.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account