Developing an assessment, monitoring, and evaluation framework for U.S. Department of Defense security cooperation / Jefferson P. Marquis, Michael J. McNerney, S. Rebecca Zimmerman, Merrie Archer, Jeremy Boback, David Stebbins.

Format:

Book

Author/Creator:

Marquis, Jefferson P., author.

McNerney, Michael J. (Michael Joseph), author.

Zimmerman, S. Rebecca, author.

Archer, Merrie, author.

Boback, Jeremy, author.

Stebbins, David, author.

Contributor:

National Defense Research Institute (U.S.)

United States. Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense, sponsoring body.

Series:

Research report (Rand Corporation)

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

National security--International cooperation--Evaluation.

National security.

Military assistance, American--Evaluation.

Military assistance, American.

United States--Military relations--Evaluation.

United States.

United States. Department of Defense--Rules and practice--Evaluation.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (xxvii, 128 pages) : color illustrations.

Place of Publication:

Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corporation, 2016.

Summary:

"At a time when the United States is increasingly relying on foreign partners for its security and attempting to build their military capacity, security cooperation activities and expenditures can no longer be justified with anecdotal evidence. This report seeks to address the challenge of creating a U.S. Department of Defense-wide (DoD-wide) system for security cooperation assessment, monitoring, and evaluation (AME): first, by analyzing existing planning and AME processes and practices inside and outside DoD to understand what works and what does not in contexts relevant to security cooperation; and second, by presenting a conceptual framework that explains how AME methods might be applied, integrated, and implemented by major security cooperation organizations so that they conform as closely as possible to analytic best practices and existing DoD policies, plans, and processes. Without leadership from the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the results of improved AME will be almost impossible to regularize and aggregate in a manner useful for security cooperation planning and management at various levels or for coordination and collaboration with security sector assistance partners outside of DoD. OSD should clarify AME roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships with respect to security cooperation. OSD should work with the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) to develop general theories of change and a set of logic models for common partner capability development areas, such as engagements, exercises, education, train and equip activities, and institution-building. OSD and DSCA should identify funding for a centralized, independent evaluation organization, as well as an organization to support and synchronize performance and effectiveness monitoring"--Publisher's web site

Contents:

Introduction Combatant command planning and AME Analysis of relevant AME frameworks Proposed DoD-wide security cooperation AME framework Recommendations for implementing an AME framework

Notes:

"October 6, 2016"--Table of contents page