My Account Log in

1 option

Contractual component repair policy : a key to improving depot responsiveness / Mary E. Chenoweth, John B. Abell.

RAND Reports Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Government document
Author/Creator:
Chenoweth, Mary E.
Contributor:
United States. Air Force.
Project Air Force (U.S.)
Rand Corporation.
Abell, John B.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Airplanes, Military--United States--Maintenance and repair--Management.
Airplanes, Military.
Defense contracts--United States--Management.
Defense contracts.
Physical Description:
xviii, 48 pages : illustrations
Place of Publication:
Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corporation, 1994.
Summary:
The Air Force spends about 40 percent of its depot-level maintenance budget on contractual maintenance. This research documents an examination of the responsiveness of contractual repair of depot-level recoverables, specifically avionics components managed by the Ogden Air Logistics Center. The report outlines the major steps in managing contractual component repair, assesses contractual repair responsiveness in terms of repair flow times for a select group of components, and suggests what the Air Force might do to enhance repair responsiveness. Significant improvement might be achieved through (a) identifying a single office at Hq Air Force Materiel Command and each air logistics center with overall responsibility for contractual repair policy, (b) implementing responsiveness reporting and measurement, (c) improving materiel support to contractual repair, (d) developing contractual approaches that incorporate responsiveness incentives, and (e) extending the use of DRIVE (Distribution and Repair in Variable Environments), a methodology for setting repair and distribution priorities, to contractual component repair.
Contents:
Introduction What goes on with contractual repair? How responsive is contractual repair? Policy directions for enhancing the responsiveness of contractual repair Summary of recommendations Appendix A: Contractor repair performance information systems Appendix B: Statistical limitations of responsiveness data Appendix C: Contractor responsiveness data analysis

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Library Catalog Using Articles+ Library Account