1 option
A unified treatment of Moore's paradox : belief, knowledge, assertion, and rationality / John N. Williams.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Williams, John N. (John Nicholas), 1952- author.
- Series:
- Oxford scholarship online.
- Oxford scholarship online
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Paradox.
- Moore, G. E. (George Edward), 1873-1958.
- Moore, G. E.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (276 pages)
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2023.
- Summary:
- Since the early twentieth century, Moore's paradox has been a challenge to the philosophical understanding of belief, assertion, knowledge, and rationality. This book offers a compelling study of the paradox by the world's leading authority on the subject, the late John Williams.
- Contents:
- Cover
- A Unified Treatment of Moore's Paradox: Belief, Knowledge, Assertion, and Rationality
- Copyright
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Foreword
- 1. What Moore's Paradox is
- 2. Why Moore's Paradox Matters
- 3. Contributions of this Book
- 4. John's Broader Contributions: Moore's Paradox and Beyond
- 5. Personal Reflections
- References
- 1: Introducing Moore's Paradox
- 1.1 A Very Brief History
- 1.2 Aims
- 2: Moore on Moore's Paradox
- 2.1 Moore's Omissive and Commissive Paradox
- 2.2 Moore's Problem as Paradox
- 2.3 Moore's Knowledge Version
- 2.4 Moore's Two Solutions
- 3: Wittgenstein on Moore's Paradox
- 3.1 Wittgenstein's Reaction
- 3.2 Report of Belief as Assertion
- 3.3 Wittgenstein's Expressivist Approach
- 3.4 Moorean Utterances without Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 3.5 Distinguishing Features of Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 4: Some Salient Approaches to Omissive and Commissive Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 4.1 Non-verbal Moore-Paradoxical Assertions
- 4.2 Partly Non-assertoric Analogues
- 4.3 Hintikka's Priority Thesis
- 4.4 Sorensen's Contribution
- 4.5 Chan's Example of MSN Messenger
- 4.6 'Self-referential' Moore-Paradoxical Assertions
- 4.7 Sorensen's Commitment Approach
- 4.8 Rosenthal's Assertibility Approach
- 4.9 Shoemaker's Priority Thesis
- 4.10 Green's Normative Approach
- 4.11 Vahid's Defective Interpretation Approach
- 4.12 Pagin's Informativeness Approach
- 4.13 Crimmins's Example
- 4.14 Pruss's Examples: Expert, Earthquake, and Robot
- 4.15 Schwitzgebel's Juliet the Implicit Racist
- 4.16 Turri's Ellie the Eliminativist
- 4.17 Hájek's Dialetheist
- 4.18 Douven's Priority Thesis
- 5: Expressing Belief and Knowledge, Assertion, and the Expressivist Approach
- 5.1 The Need for an Analysis of Assertion
- 5.2 Expressing Belief, Conviction, or Knowledge.
- 5.3 An Analysis of Assertion
- 5.4 Utterance Without Assertion
- 5.5 Back to Pruss: Earthquake and Robot
- 5.6 Expressing Lack of Belief or Knowledge via Assertion
- 5.7 An Expressivist Account of Omissive and Commissive Absurdity
- 5.8 The Expressivist Account and Other Examples of Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 5.9 The Expressivist Account and the Knowledge Version in Assertion
- 6: An Account of Belief
- 6.1 Belief without Qualification, or 'Occurrent' Belief
- 6.2 Judgement
- 6.3 Dispositional Beliefs
- 6.4 Conscious Beliefs
- 6.5 Unconscious Beliefs
- 6.6 The Possibility of Overtly Contradictory Beliefs
- 6.7 Searle's Principle
- 6.8 Belief as Assignment of Subjective Probability and Degrees of Conviction
- 7: Some Salient Approaches to Moore's Paradox in Belief
- 7.1 Hintikka's Epistemic Logic Approach
- 7.2 A Digression: Pruss's Three Objections to Belief-Distribution
- 7.3 Back to Hintikka's Epistemic Logic Approach
- 7.4 Sorensen's Contribution
- 7.5 Sorensen's Iterated Cases
- 7.6 Heal's Positive Infallibility Approach
- 7.7 Sorensen's Commitment to Directly Opposed Belief Approach
- 7.8 Garvey's Omissive Alcoholic
- 7.9 Shoemaker's Self-intimation Approach
- 7.10 Baldwin's Conscious Belief Approach
- 7.11 Kriegel's Conscious Belief Approach
- 7.12 Fernández's Extrospective Justification Approach
- 7.13 De Almeida's Justification Approach
- 7. 14 Douven's Probabilistic Approach
- 8: The Knowledge Version in Belief
- 8.1 Williamson's Commitment to Knowledge as the Norm of Belief
- 8.2 Sutton's Knowledge Norm for Belief
- 8.3 Bird's Norm of Justification for Belief
- 8.4 Douven's Probabilistic Approach to the Knowledge Version in Belief
- 8.5 Huemer's Knowledge Norm for Belief
- 8.6 An Alternative Proposal: The Aim of Belief is Truth
- 8.7 Concluding Remarks
- 9: The Knowledge Version in Assertion.
- 9.1 The Aims of Assertion
- 9.2 Green's Argument for the Absurdity of Asserting the Knowledge Version
- 9.3 Williamson's Knowledge Account of Assertion
- 9.4 The Ordinary Practice Argument for the Knowledge Norm of Assertion, and Its Supporters
- 9.5 Williamson's Lottery Argument
- 9.6 Koethe's Lottery Argument
- 9.7 Problems with Koethe's General Position
- 9.8 Some Assertions of the Form 'p but I don't know that p' are not Absurd
- 9.9 Some Assertions of the Form 'p but I don't know that p' are Absurd
- 9.10 The Emptiness of the Knowledge Account: What's Wrong with Breaking the Rule?
- 9.11 The Category Mistake of the Knowledge Account
- 9.12 Explaining the Absurdity or Non-absurdity of Assertions
- 9.13 Types of Assertion and Their Norms of Success
- 9.14 Interlocutor Norms of Assertion
- 10: The Priority of Belief Thesis and the Incredibility of the Assertor
- 10.1 The Priority of Belief Thesis and Rational Expression of Irrational Belief
- 10.2 Believing the Assertor
- 10.3 Rational Expression of Irrational Non-Moorean Belief
- 10.4 Omissive Moore-Paradoxical Assertion and Believing the Assertor
- 10.5 Expressing Omissive Moore-Paradoxical Belief
- 10.6 Rational Commissive Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 10.7 The Incredibility of the Assertor and Two Deviant Types of Assertion
- 10.8 The Incredibility of the Assertor and Other Examples of Moore-Paradoxical Assertion
- 10.9 The Incredibility of the Assertor and the Knowledge Version
- 10.10 Other Examples of Moorean Assertion to be Dealt with
- 11: Conscious Belief
- 11.1 Fully Conscious Belief Collects as Well as Distributes over Conjunction
- 11.2 Fully Conscious Belief and the Incredibility of the Assertor
- 11.3 Fully Conscious Belief and Expressing Belief via Assertion
- 11.4 Fully Conscious Moore-Paradoxical Belief.
- 11.5 Other Examples of Fully Conscious Moore-Paradoxical Belief
- 11.6 Fully Conscious Belief and the Knowledge Version
- 11.7 Fully Conscious Belief as Part of a Diachronic Process
- 12: The Self-falsification Account in Belief and Assertion, Rationality, and Absurdity
- 12.1 The Basic Self-falsification Account of the Epistemic Irrationality of Moore-Paradoxical Belief
- 12.2 The Normative Self-falsification Account of the Epistemic Irrationality of Moore-Paradoxical Belief
- 12.3 The Normative Self-falsification Account and Other Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs
- 12.4 Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs and Absurdity: Extending the Normative Self-falsification Account
- 12.5 Chan's Objection
- 12.6 'I Don't Believe This Proposition' as a Problem for Philosophical Theology
- 13: Eliminativism, Dialetheism, and Moore's Paradox
- 13.1 Ellie the Eliminativist and Di the Dialetheist
- 13.2 Ellie's Omissive Belief and Epistemic Rationality
- 13.3 Ellie's Omissive Belief and Absurdity
- 13.4 Ellie's Omissive Assertion and Practical Rationality
- 13.5 Ellie's Omissive Assertion and Absurdity
- 13.6 Di's Commissive Belief and Epistemic Rationality
- 13.7 Di's Commissive Belief and Absurdity
- 13.8 Di's Commissive Assertion and Practical Rationality
- 13.9 Di's Commissive Assertion and Absurdity
- 13.10 Diane, a More Extreme Dialetheist
- 14: Moore's Paradox and Sorensen's Iterated Cases
- 14.1 Sorensen's Iterated Beliefs
- 14.2 Why the Iterated Beliefs are not Moore-Paradoxical
- 14.3 The Irrationality of the Iterated Beliefs
- 14.4 The Irrationality of the Iterated Assertions
- 14.5 Increasing Iteration and Absurdity in Belief
- 14.6 Increasing Iteration and Absurdity in Assertion
- 15: The Justification Approach to Moore-Paradoxical Belief
- 15.1 Preliminary Remarks: Being Justified in Believing
- 15.2 The Externalist Syllogism.
- 15.3 Vahid's Two Objections
- 15.4 Fernández's Objections
- 15.5 The Internalist Evidential Argument
- 15.6 Applying the Account to Some Other Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs
- 15.7 The Justification Approach and the Knowledge Version
- 16: Defining Moore-Paradoxicality The Preface Paradox and Rational Inconsistent Belief
- 16.1 Defining Moore-Paradoxicality
- 16.2 The Original Version of the Preface Paradox
- 16.3 A Less Generalized Version of the Preface Paradox: World Capitals
- 16.4 A More Generalized Version of the Preface Paradox: Fallibility
- 16.5 A Maximally Generalized Version of the Preface Paradox: Modesty
- 17: Moore's Paradox and Desire
- 17.1 Preliminary Remarks
- 17.2 Moore's Paradox in Desire
- 17.3 Desires May be Rational or Irrational
- 17.4 Rational and Irrational Moorean Desires
- 17.5 Some Future Directions of Enquiry
- 18: Further Work
- Index.
- Notes:
- Also issued in print: 2023.
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed on May 19, 2023).
- Other Format:
- Print version: Williams, John N. A Unified Treatment of Moore's Paradox
- ISBN:
- 0-19-180410-X
- 0-19-106533-1
- 0-19-887955-5
- OCLC:
- 1375296499
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.