1 option
Deathquest : an introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States / Robert M. Bohm.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Bohm, Robert M., author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Capital punishment--United States.
- Capital punishment.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xxiv, 569 pages.)
- Edition:
- Fifth edition.
- Place of Publication:
- New York ; London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
- Contents:
- 1. History of the death penalty in the United States : the pre-modern period
- Death penalty in Colonial times
- Death penalty laws
- Executions and saving souls
- Death penalty abolitionists
- The death penalty in the Nineteenth Century
- Hiding executions from the public
- From mandatory to discretionary capital punishment statutes
- States abolish the death penalty
- From locally authorized to state-authorized executions
- The death penalty in the first half of the Twentieth Century
- States abolish and reinstate the death penalty
- The death penalty form 1950 to the mid-1960s
- The case of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg
- The case of Caryl Chessman
- 2. Capital punishment and the Supreme Court : the pre-modern period
- Judicial review and the regulation of capital punishment
- Pre-modern Supreme court death penalty cases
- Clemency
- Coerced confessions and compelled self-incrimination
- Execution methods and procedures
- Defective lineup procedures
- Double jeopardy
- Effective assistance of counsel
- Equal protection
- Ex post facto
- Fair trials
- Jurisdiction
- Jury instructions
- Jury selection
- Sentencing
- 3. The challenge to capital punishment's legality
- The Rudolph case
- The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund lawyers
- The Maxwell case
- United States v. Jackson and Witherspoon v. Illinois
- Boykin v. Alabama
- McGautha v. California and Crampton v. Ohio
- Aikens, Branch, Jackson, and Furman
- Furman v. Georgia
- Woodson v. North Carolina and Gregg v. Georgia
- Aggravating versus mitigating or weighing death penalty statutes
- Aggravating-only or threshold death penalty statutes
- Structured discretion or directed statutes
- Automatic appellate review
- 4. Capital punishment and the Supreme Court : the modern period
- The constitutionality of death penalty statutes
- What crimes are capital
- Mitigating circumstances
- Aggravating circumstances
- The Appellate Process
- Capital juries
- Who may or may not be executed
- Assistance of counsel
- Other procedural issues
- 5. The death penalty at the Federal level, in the military, and globally
- Death penalty at the Federal level
- Capital punishment and the Federal courts
- Federal capital crimes
- Federal capital punishment procedures
- Federal executions
- The Racial Justice Act and the Fairness in Death Sentencing Act
- The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996
- The Innocence Protection Act of 2004
- Death penalty in the military
- Military executions
- Military capital offenses
- Military capital punishment procedures
- A study of the military's modern death penalty
- The death penalty in the global context
- Abolishing the death penalty for all crimes
- Abolishing the death penalty in practice
- Abolishing the death penalty for all but exceptional crimes
- Abolitionist countries that reintroduced the death penalty
- Retentionist countries and their execution records
- On the worldwide trend toward abolition
- Responses to American exceptionalism regarding capital punishment
- 6. Cruel and unusual punishment, Death Row, and methods of execution
- Introduction : cruel and unusual punishment
- What about long stays on Death Row?
- What about the execution of elderly and infirm Death Row inmates?
- What about conditions on Death Row?
- Methods of execution
- Hanging
- Firing squad
- Electrocution
- Lethal gas
- Lethal injection
- The execution process
- The death warrant
- Deathwatch
- Executions
- A note on witnessing an execution
- 7. General deterrence and the death penalty
- The relative importance of general deterrence
- Arguments and counterarguments
- Evidence
- Pre-1975 studies
- Ehrlich finds a general deterrent effect
- Post-Ehrlich studies
- Five counterarguments to studies that show no general deterrent effect
- Assumptions and problems with Deterrence Theory
- The counterdeterrent or brutalizing effect
- Murder versus capital punishment
- 8. Future dangerousness, incapacitation, and economic costs of capital punishment
- Are executions necessary?
- Escapes, errors, oversights, and other mistakes
- Why not execute all capital offenders?
- Selecting the very worst
- LWOP (life without parole) as an alternative
- The Furman-commuted inmates
- Incapacitation
- The economic costs of capital punishment versus life imprisonment
- Economic costs of capital punishment under Pre-Furman statutes
- Economic costs of capital punishment under Post-Furman statutes
- Pretrial
- Trial
- Posttrial
- Imprisonment
- Execution
- Streamlining the Appellate and postconviction process
- 9. Miscarriages of justice and the death penalty
- Definitions of innocence
- Miscarriages of justice in pre-Gregg (1976) capital cases
- Borchard's research
- Bedau's research
- Research by Bedau and Radelet
- Miscarriages of justice in post-Gregg (1976) capital cases : despite super due process
- Wrongful executions under post-Gregg (1976) statutes
- Errors in capital cases
- Why wrongful convictions occur in capital cases
- Shoddy investigation and misconduct by the police
- Eyewitness misidentification and perjury by prosecution witnesses
- False confessions
- Guilty pleas by innocent defendants
- Prosecutor misconduct
- Inadequate DNA testing requirements
- Judicial misconduct or error
- Bad defense lawyers
- Jury problems
- The illusive hope of clemency
- What can be done?
- Good defense attorneys
- Adopt the ABA's 2003 Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases
- Punish the misconduct of defense attorneys
- Improve police investigations, interrogations, and the handling of evidence
- Improve eyewitness identification techniques and procedures
- Improve the work and credibility of crime laboratory technicians
- Improve DNA testing requirements
- Set rigorous standards for jailhouse snitches.informants
- Improve police training
- Punish police misconduct
- Guide prosecutors' decisions to seek the death penalty
- Improve disclosure requirements
- Punish prosecutor misconduct
- Better training and certification of trial judges in capital cases
- Give trial judges veto power
- Eliminate time limits and other constraints on claims of actual innocence
- Improve the clemency process
- Collect relevant data
- Innocence projects and innocence commissions
- Assistance and indemnity
- Moratorium
- 10. Arbitrariness and discrimination in the administration of the death penalty
- Under post-Furman statutes
- Few death-eligible offenders are executed
- Application of the death penalty across jurisdictions and over time
- Post-Furman statutes justify arbitrariness
- Jurors' misunderstanding or underestimating their sentencing obligations
- Rule changes by the supreme court
- Problems in determining murderous intent
- Plea bargaining
- Appellate Courts
- Discrimination in the administration of the death penalty under post-Furman statutes
- Disparity versus discrimination
- Discrimination based on social class and the definition of murder
- Discrimination by gender
- Discrimination by age
- Racial discrimination
- Race-of-offender discrimination
- Race-of-victim discrimination
- Theories of racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 493-543) and index.
- Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI Available via World Wide Web.
- Description based on print version record.
- Local Notes:
- Acquired for the Penn Libraries with assistance from the Lipman Criminology Library Fund.
- ISBN:
- 9781317377849 (electronic bk.)
- 1317377842 (electronic bk.)
- Publisher Number:
- 99992182557
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.