2 options
Landmark cases in medical law / edited by Jonathan Herring and Jesse Wall.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- Landmark cases.
- Landmark cases
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Medical laws and legislation.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (380 p.)
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford ; Portland, Ore. : Hart Publishing, 2015.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- "This new addition to Hart Publishing's Landmark Cases series brings together leading figures in the field to discuss a selection of the most significant cases in medical law. These are cases which either signpost a new development for medical law, illustrate an important development of the law, or signpost likely future developments of the law. The cases are explored in their social and historical context to understand better what has influenced the development of the law. This collection provides a fascinating insight in the interaction of medical law and broader social changes to our bodies, illness and medical professionals."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Contents:
- Introduction
- Jonathan Herring and Jesse Wall
- 1. Doodeward v Spence (1908)
- Loane Skene
- 2. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]: Medical Law ' s Accordion
- José Miola
- 3. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation) [1988]: 'People Like Us Don't Have Babies': Learning Disability,
- Prospective Parenthood and Legal Transformations
- Kirsty Keywood
- 4. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Medical Treatment) [1981]: 'The Child Must Live': Disability, Parents and the Law
- Jonathan Herring
- 5. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] Charles Foster
- 6. R v Cambridge Health Authority, ex parte B (A Minor) [1995]: A Tale of Two Judgments
- Jesse Wall
- 7. R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, ex parte L [1999]: Bournewood Fifteen Years On
- Genevra Richardson
- 8. Re MB (An Adult: Medical Treatment) [1997] and St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1998]: The Dilemma of the ' Court-Ordered ' Caesarean
- Marie Fox and Kirsty Moreton
- 9. R v Department of Health, ex parte Source Informatics Ltd [1999]
- Mark Taylor
- 10. McFarlane v Tayside Health Board [2000] and Cattanach v Melchior [2003]
- Laura Hoyano
- 11. Chester v Afshar [2004]
- Sarah Green
- 12. R (on the Application of Burke) v General Medical Council [2004]; Burke v United Kingdom [2006]:
- Contemporaneous and Advance Requests: The Fight for Rights at the End of Life
- Shaun D Pattinson
- 13. The Right to Die and the Right to Help: R (on the Application of Purdy) v Directorof Public Prosecutions [2009] and Its Legacy
- Kate Greasley
- 14. Yearworth and Others v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009]
- 15. A, B and C v Ireland [2010]
- Imogen Goold
- Notes:
- Includes index.
- ISBN:
- 9781782255550
- 1782255559
- 9781474201438
- 1474201431
- 9781782255543
- 1782255540
- OCLC:
- 911179571
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.