Landmark cases in public law / Edited by Satvinder Juss and Maurice Sunkin.

Format:

Book

Contributor:

Juss, Satvinder S. (Satvinder Singh), editor.

Sunkin, Maurice, editor.

Series:

Landmark cases

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Administrative law--Great Britain--Cases.

Administrative law.

Constitutional law--Great Britain--Cases.

Constitutional law.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (373 pages)

Place of Publication:

Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2017.

System Details:

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Summary:

Landmark Cases in Public Law answers the need for an historical examination of the leading cases in this field, an examination which is largely absent from the standard textbooks and journal articles of the day. Adopting a contextualised historical approach, this collection of essays by leading specialists in the field provides both an explanation of the importance and impact of the chosen decisions, as well as doctrinal analysis. This approach enables each author to throw light on the driving forces behind the judicial outcomes, and shows how the final reasoning of the court was ultimately as much dependent upon such human factors as the attitudes, conduct, and personalities of the parties, their witnesses, their counsel, and the judges, as the drive to seek legal realignment with the political developments that were widely perceived to be taking place. In this way, this form of analysis provides an exposition of the true stories behind these landmark cases in public law

Contents:

1. Entick v Carrington [1765]: Revisited All the King's Horses

Richard Gordon

2. Ridge v Baldwin [1964]: 'Nuff Said'

SH Bailey

3. Padfield v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food [1968]: Judges and Parliamentary Democracy

Maurice Sunkin

4. Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1968]: In Perspective

David Feldman

5. Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the Prerogative

Richard Drabble

6. The Factortame Litigation: Sovereignty in Question

John MCEldowney

7. M v The Home Office [1992]: Ministers and Injunctions

Christopher Forsyth

8. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh Case

Richard Clayton

9. R v North and East Devon Health Authority [2001]: Coughlan and the Development of Public Law

Kirsty Hughes

10. R (Jackson) v Attorney-General [2005]: Reviewing Legislation

Elizabeth Wicks

11. Bancoult and the Royal Prerogative in Colonial Constitutional Law

Satvinder S Juss

12. AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate and Others [2012]: The Nature of Devolved Legislation and the Role of the Courts

The Honourable Mr Justice Lewis

13. Evans v Attorney General [2015]: The Underlying Normativity of Constitutional Disagreement

Thomas Fairclough

Epilogue: Miller, the Legislature and the Executive

Paul Craig

Notes:

Includes index.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.

ISBN:

9781474201902

1474201903

9781782255567

1782255567

OCLC:

967457325