My Account Log in

2 options

Constitutional Rights and Constitutional Design : Moral and Empirical Reasoning in Judicial Review / Paul Yowell.

Bloomsbury Collections Hart Publishing 2018 Available online

View online

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Yowell, Paul, 1969- author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Civil rights.
Constitutional courts.
Judicial ethics.
Judicial review--Moral and ethical aspects.
Judicial review.
Physical Description:
1 online resource
Edition:
First edition.
Place of Publication:
Oxford [UK] ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2018.
Summary:
The decisions courts make in constitutional rights cases pervade our political life and touch on our most basic interests and values. The spread of judicial review of legislation around the world means that courts are increasingly called on to settle matters of moral and political controversy, including assisted suicide, data privacy, anti-terrorism measures, marriage, and abortion. But doubts regarding the institutional capacities of courts for deciding such questions are growing. Judges now regularly review social science research to assess whether a law will effectively achieve its aim, and at what cost to other interests. They cite studies and statistical information from psychology, sociology, medicine, and other disciplines in which they are rarely trained. This empirical reasoning proceeds alongside open-ended moral reasoning, with judges employing terms such as equality, liberty, and autonomy, then determining what these require in concrete circumstances. This book shows that courts were not designed for this kind of moral and empirical reasoning. It argues that in comparison to legislatures, the institutional capacities of courts are deficient. Legislatures are better equipped than courts for deliberating and decision-making in regard to the kinds of factual and moral issues that arise in constitutional rights cases. The book concludes by considering the implications of comparative institutional capacity for constitutional design. Is a system of judicial review of legislation something that constitutional framers should choose to adopt? If so, in what form? For countries with systems of judicial review, practical proposals are made to remedy deficiencies in the institutional capacities of courts
Contents:
The adjudication of constitutional rights
Are rights trumps?
Judicial capacity and empirical research
Comparative analysis of institutional capacities
The problem of entrenchment
Judicial review and constitutional design.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.
ISBN:
9781509913626
1509913629
9781509913619
1509913610
OCLC:
1012653930

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account