My Account Log in

4 options

EU competition litigation : transposition and first experiences of the new regime / edited by Magnus Strand, Vladimir Bastidas Venegas, Marios C Iacovides.

Bloomsbury Collections Hart Publishing 2019 Available online

View online

Bloomsbury Open Access Available online

View online

DOAB Directory of Open Access Books Available online

View online

OAPEN Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Conference/Event
Contributor:
Strand, Magnus, editor.
Bastidas Venegas, Vladimir, 1974- editor.
Iacovides, Marios C., editor.
Swedish Network for European Legal Studies, sponsoring body.
Conference Name:
EU Competition Law and the New Private Enforcement Regime: First Experiences from Its Implementation (Conference) (2017 : Uppsala universitet)
Series:
Swedish Studies in European Law
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
European Parliament. Antitrust damages directive--Congresses.
European Parliament.
Antitrust law--European Union countries--Congresses.
Antitrust law.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (xxviii, 241 pages)
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Oxford, England : Hart, [2019]
Summary:
"All EU Member States have now transposed Directive 2014/104/EU on damages actions for breaches of competition law into national law. The directive (and the soft-law instruments accompanying it) does not only mark a new phase for private enforcement of competition law but also, more generally, a novel and thought-provoking instance of EU harmonization of aspects of private law and civil litigation. Following up on a previous Hart volume in the Swedish Studies in European Law series, published in 2016, this book offers contributions from top practitioners and scholars from all over Europe who present and discuss first experiences from the implementation of the new damages regime in various jurisdictions. Topics covered include theoretical and practical reflections on the state of private enforcement in Europe, the balancing of conflicting interests pertaining to public and private enforcement of competition law respectively, and specific legal issues such as causation and the estimation of harm. The authors explore problems solved, problems created, and future challenges in the new regime of private enforcement of competition law in Europe, offering predictions as to issues that may have to be settled through recourse to the European Court of Justice"-- Provided by publisher.
Contents:
Intro
Foreword
Editorial Preface
Table of Contents
Table of Cases
Table of Legislation
PART I: ROLLING OUT THE NEW PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT REGIME
1. EU Competences and the Damages Directive: The Continuum Between Minimum and Full Harmonisation
I. Introduction
II. The Directive as Minimum Harmonisation of the Right to Damages
III. The Member States' Competence Continuum
IV. Conclusions and Outlook
2. The State of Private Enforcement of Competition Law: A Practitioner's Perspective
II. Damage Quantification and Interest
III. Passing-on Defence and Indirect Purchasers
IV. The Disclosure of Evidence Inter Partes
V. Access to Information from Competition Authorities
VI. Joint and Several Liability and Choice of Defendants
VII. Jurisdiction and Applicable Law
VIII. Considerations on the Choice of Forum
IX. Litigation Funding and Claims Bundling
X. Conclusion
3. Managing Transposition and Avoiding Fragmentation: The Example of Limitation Periods and Interest
I. Limitation Periods and Interest in Competition Damages
II. Directive 2014/104 on Limitation Periods and Interest
III. Transposing the Relevant Passages into Swedish Law
IV. The Practical Consequences of the Transposition
V. Discussions and Conclusions
4. A First Look at the Portuguese Act 23/2018 Transposing the Private Enforcement Directive
I. The Transposition Procedure of the Private Enforcement Directive
II. The Scope of the Portuguese Act
III. Exclusive Competence of the Specialised Portuguese Court for Competition Regulation and Supervision
IV. Substantive Solutions
V. Amendments beyond the Implementation of the Directive: Collective Redress
VI. Conclusion
PART II: BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT.
5. Private Enforcement of Public Law - An Inconsistent Approach to Remedies?
I. Private Enforcement in General
II. Behavioural Remedies in Swedish Competition Law
III. Subsidiary Claims in Swedish Law
IV. The Effects of the Subsidiary Right to Litigate
V. Concluding Remarks
6. The Binding Effects of Decisions and Judgments under EU Competition Law
II. Court Judgments in Subsequent Domestic Court Proceedings
III. Court Judgments in Cross-border Situations
IV. Judgments in Subsequent Administrative Proceedings
V. CA Decisions in Subsequent Administrative Proceedings
VI. CA Decisions in Subsequent Proceedings before Domestic Courts
VII. CA Decisions before Courts in Cross-border Situations
VIII. Commission Decisions in Subsequent Proceedings before Courts
IX. Commission Decisions in Subsequent Proceedings before CA
X. Concluding Remarks
7. Facilitating Follow-on Actions? Public and Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law After Directive 2014/104
II. The Tasks of Public and Private Enforcement
III. Encouraging Private Action by Public Action
IV. Damages as Part of Public Enforcement
V. Concluding Discussion
8. The Practical and Legal Effects of National Decisions in Subsequent Damages Actions
I. Article 9 of the Directive
II. The Transposition of Article 9 in Swedish Law
III. Analysis of Article 9: A Swedish Example of Inconsistencies
IV. Conclusions
9. The Quest for Evidence - Still an Uphill Battle for Cartel Victims?
II. Taking the Risk of Going to Court
III. The Directive's Provisions on Disclosure
IV. Accessing the Commission's Case File
V. Accessing Information through the Commission's Infringement Decisions - The Evonik Degussa Case
VI. Joining the Dots.
PART III: SOLVED AND UNSOLVED ISSUES IN PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT
10. Damages Actions in Article 102 TFEU Cases: The New Frontier for Private Enforcement
II. Distinctive Features of Article 102 TFEU Civil Litigation
III. The Conditions for Establishing Civil Liability
IV. A Swedish Case Study: Telia Follow-on Damages
11. Implementing the Rules of the Damages Directive on Joint and Several Liability: The SME Derogation
II. Exception for 'Failing SMEs': Background
III. SME Status
IV. Applicable Conditions for the 'Failing SME' Exception
V. The Extent of SME Liability
VI. Anticipated Consequences and the Assessment
12. Causation and Damage: What the Directive Does Not Solve and Remarks on Relevant EU Law
II. The Requirement and Notion of Full Compensation
III. The Full Effect, Effective Application and Practical Effects of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU
IV. Remote Damages, and Long and Complex Causal Links
V. Causation and Damage-related Presumptions and Facilitations
VI. Concluding Remarks
13. The Presumption of Harm and its Implementation in the Member States' Legal Orders
II. The Legal Nature and Scope of Application of the Presumption of Harm
III. The Implementation of the Presumption of Harm in Member States' Laws: Open Issues
IV. Conclusion
14. Article 17(3) of the Damages Directive and the Interaction Between the Swedish Competition Authority and Swedish Courts
II. The Legislative History of Article 17(3)
III. The Aim of Article 17(3)
IV. Some Relevant Swedish Context
V. The Non-transposition of Article 17(3) in Swedish Law
VI. Conclusions
Index.
Notes:
Description based on print version record.
Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
ISBN:
1-5099-2202-4
1-5099-2203-2
OCLC:
1090493766
Access Restriction:
Open access Unrestricted online access

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account