1 option
The Hughes Court : from progressivism to pluralism, 1930 to 1941 / Mark V. Tushnet.
Van Pelt Library KF8742.A45 H55 v.11
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Tushnet, Mark, 1945- author.
- Series:
- History of the Supreme Court of the United States ; v. 11.
- The Oliver Wendell Holmes devise history of the Supreme Court of the United States ; volume XI
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- United States. Supreme Court--History.
- United States.
- Political questions and judicial power--United States--History.
- Political questions and judicial power.
- Constitutional history--United States.
- Constitutional history.
- Progressivism (United States politics)--History--20th century.
- Progressivism (United States politics).
- Legal polycentricity--United States--History--20th century.
- Legal polycentricity.
- Hughes, Charles Evans, 1862-1948.
- Hughes, Charles Evans.
- Genre:
- History.
- Physical Description:
- xxxiv, 1238 pages ; 25 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2021.
- Summary:
- "Steven Shapin began a classic work with this sentence: "There was no such thing as the Scientific Revolution, and this is a book about it."1 This book's theme might be put in similar terms. There was no Constitutional Revolution of 1937, and this is a book about it. As the book's subtitle suggests, the Hughes Court from its inception in 1930 was in large measure a Progressive court, committed in a wide range of areas to the vision of active government associated with the Progressive movement in thought and politics. The Court was not dominated by a deep formalism, though most of the justices, liberals and conservatives alike, had their moments of formalism - and not merely for strategic reasons when controlling precedent forced formalism on them. At one time or another and cumulatively a great deal of the time, all of the justices incorporated ideas about good public policy in their interpretations of the Constitution and federal statutes"-- Provided by publisher.
- Contents:
- Personnel and organizing ideas
- Formulas and conceptions of basic needs : an overview
- The complex world of simple formulas
- Formulas and considerations of basic needs in business regulation cases
- Blaisdell
- Nebbia
- The gold clause cases
- Black Monday, May 27, 1935
- Winter 1935-36
- Spring 1936
- The court packing plan
- Resolution
- Was there a "switch in time"?
- After the storm : personnel and organization
- Consolidating the new constitutional regime : the first plank-the scope of national power
- Consolidating the new constitutional regime : the second plank -state regulation of business
- Consolidating the new constitutional regime : the third and fourth planks- labor law and intergovernmental immunity
- Toward a theory of pluralism
- Envisioning administrative law
- Constitutional limitations on agencies
- The president's role
- The courts' role in administrative law
- The uncertainties of theory
- Progressivism, prohibition, and organized crime : criminal law in the 1930s
- Race, criminal justice, and "labor defense"
- Race and strategic litigation
- The Hughes Court and radical political dissent
- The Hughes Court and radical religious dissent
- Basic concepts of justiciability
- Sovereign immunity and political questions
- Regulating access to the national courts
- ERIE
- ERIE's legacy
- Form and style in statutory interpretation
- The Supreme Court and the new deal economics
- Regulating strikes
- Regulating the NLRB
- The labor-antitrust interface
- The justices and the theories
- Demonstrations, picketing, and First Amendment theories
- The Jehovah's witnesses and First Amendment theories.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Other Format:
- Online version: Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- Hughes Court.
- ISBN:
- 9781316515938
- 1316515931
- OCLC:
- 1263663390
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.