1 option
Ethics and existence : the legacy of Derek Parfit / edited by Jeff McMahan [and three others].
- Format:
- Book
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Ethics.
- Population--Moral and ethical aspects.
- Population.
- Parfit, Derek--Influence.
- Parfit, Derek.
- Genre:
- Festschriften.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (viii, 579 pages) : illustrations
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Other Title:
- Legacy of Derek Parfit
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford, United Kingdom : Oxford University Press, 2022.
- Summary:
- Derek Parfit, who died in 2017, is widely believed to have been the best moral philosopher in well over a century. The twenty new essays in this book were written in his honour and have all been inspired by his work - in particular, his work in an area of moral philosophy known as 'population ethics', which is concerned with moral issues raised by causing people to exist. Until Parfit began writing about these issues in the 1970s, there was almost no discussion of them in the entire history of philosophy. But his monumental book 'Reasons and Persons' (1984) revealed that population ethics abounds in deep and intractable problems and paradoxes that not only challenge all the major moral theories but also threaten to undermine many important common-sense moral beliefs.
- Contents:
- Cover
- Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit
- Copyright
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter Abstracts
- Ralf Bader: 'The Asymmetry'
- M. A. Roberts: 'The Value and Probabilities of Existence'
- Hilary Greaves and John Cusbert: 'Comparing Existence and Non-Existence'
- Patrick Tomlin: 'The Impure Non-Identity Problem'
- Elizabeth Harman: 'Abortion and the Non-identity Problem'
- Andrew McGee and Julian Savulescu: 'A Partial Solution to the Non-Identity Problem: Regretting One Was Born and Having a Life Not Subjectively Worth Living'
- Larry Temkin: 'Population Ethics Forty Years On: Some Lessons Learned from "Box Ethics"'
- Jacob M. Nebel: 'Totalism without Repugnance'
- Johann Frick: 'Context-Dependent Betterness and the Mere Addition Paradox'
- Niko Kolodny: 'Saving Posterity from a Worse Fate'
- Andreas L. Mogensen: 'Against Large Number Scepticism'
- William MacAskill: 'Are We Living at the Hinge of History?'
- S. J. Beard and Patrick Kaczmarek: 'On Theory X and What Matters Most'
- Ruth Chang: 'How to Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion'
- Wlodek Rabinowicz: 'Can Parfit's Appeal to Incommensurabilities in Value Block the Continuum Argument for the Repugnant Conclusion?'
- Gustaf Arrhenius: 'Population Ethics and Conflict-of-Value Imprecision'
- Teruji Thomas: 'On Evaluative Imprecision'
- Theron Pummer: 'Sorites on What Matters'
- Michael Otsuka: 'Prioritarianism, Population Ethics, and Competing Claims'
- Shlomi Segall: 'Quarantining Prioritarianism'
- PART I: CAUSING PEOPLE TO EXISTAND THE NON-IDENTITY PROBLEM
- 1: The Asymmetry
- 1.1 The Basic Account
- 1.1.1 The First Half
- 1.1.2 The Second Half
- 1.2 Extending the Account
- 1.2.1 Lives that Are Initially Worth Living
- 1.2.1.1 Coarse-Grained Options
- 1.2.1.2 Fine-Grained Asymmetry
- 1.2.2 Externalities.
- 1.2.3 Adding Groups
- 1.2.4 Probabilistic Cases
- 1.2.4.1 Time-Slice Aggregation
- 1.2.4.2 Initial-Segment Aggregation
- 1.2.4.3 Different-Number Cases
- 1.2.5 Absolute Harm
- 1.3 Conclusion
- References
- 2: The Value and Probabilities of Existence
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Notes on Figures, Assumptions, Vocabulary
- 2.3 Commitments
- 2.3.1 The Miserable Child Case: Why PBI Must Be VeryNarrowly Formulated
- 2.3.2 The Three Outcome Case
- 2.3.3 Objection: Why PBI Must Be Understood as Expansive
- 2.4 Formal Statement of PBI
- 2.5 The Better Chance Puzzle
- 2.6 The Better Chance Case versus the Nonidentity Problem
- 2.7 Solving the Better Chance Puzzle
- 2.7.1 Two Proposed Solutions Based on the Concept of Expected Value
- 2.7.1.1 Unadulterated Expected Value Approach
- 2.7.1.2 Combination Approach: EVNPBI+EV
- 2.7.2 Probable Value Approach
- 2.7.3 Summing Up the Solution
- Implications for Connection
- 2.8 Avoiding the Nonidentity Fallacy
- 2.9 Conclusion
- 3: Comparing Existence and Non-Existence
- 3.1 Introduction and Motivations
- 3.2 The Metaphysical Argument against Existence Comparativism
- 3.2.1 The Argument
- 3.2.2 Accepting Anti-comparativism
- 3.2.3 Denying Ontological Commitment
- 3.3 Variantism
- 3.4 Metaphysical Actualism
- 3.4.1 Property Actualism
- 3.4.2 Singular Propositions
- 3.4.3 Metaphysical Actualism Revisited
- 3.5 The Lives Account
- 3.5.1 Comparing Possible Lives
- 3.5.2 Existence Comparativism and Null Lives
- 3.5.3 Objections
- 3.5.4 Other Applications of the Lives Account
- 3.6 Bykvist's Argument
- 3.7 The Well-being Argument
- 3.8 Summary and Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- 4: The Impure Non-Identity Problem
- 4.1 Introduction
- 4.2 Two Non-Identity Cases
- 4.3 Impure Non-Identity: Circle Cases.
- 4.4 Impure Non-Identity: Overdetermination of Identity
- 4.5 Moral Implications
- 4.5.1 Impure Non-Identity Cases and the No Difference View
- 4.5.2 Impure Non-Identity Cases and the Difference View
- 4.6 Double Overdetermination Cases
- 4.7 Concluding Remarks and Practical Applications
- 5: Abortion and the Non-Identity Problem
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 The Non-identity Problem and Its Solution
- 5.3 The No Moral Status View and the Ever Conscious View
- 5.4 The Full Moral Status view
- 5.5 The Low Moral Status View
- 5.6 A General Account of Non-Identity Cases
- 5.7 Conclusion
- 6: A Partial Solution to the Non-Identity Problem: Regretting One Was Born and Having a Life Not Subjectively Worth Living
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 The Challenge of the Non-identity Problem
- 6.3 Preliminary: Some Basic Concepts
- 6.4 How the Notion of Regretting Being Born May Come Apart from the Notion of a Life Not Worth Living
- 6.4.1 Two Possible Objections
- 6.4.2 How Many People Born in Beisner's Circumstances Are Likely to Share Her Reaction?
- 6.5 Subjective Valuation as Expression of Autonomy
- 6.6 Conclusion
- PART II: THE REPUGNANT CONCLUSION, FUTURE GENERATIONS, AND EXTINCTION
- 7: Population Ethics Forty Years On: Some Lessons Learned from "Box Ethics"
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 The Repugnant Conclusion and Some Other "Box" Cases
- 7.3 The Capped Model of Ideals
- 7.4 Neutrality Intuitions, Dominance Principles, and the Relative Normative Significance of People, Spaces, and Times
- 7.5 Some Open Questions Concerning a Capped Model of Ideals
- 8: Totalism without Repugnance
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Well-Being
- 8.3 Lexical Thresholds
- 8.3.1 Superiority and Noninferiority
- 8.3.2 Multiple Thresholds
- 8.4 Marginal Differences, Incompleteness, and Vagueness
- 8.5 The Problem of Risk.
- 8.6 Conclusion
- 9: Context-Dependent Betterness and the Mere Addition Paradox
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.2 The Mere Addition Paradox
- 9.3 Temkin on the Mere Addition Paradox and the Non-transitivity of "Better Than"
- 9.4 A Crucial Ambiguity
- 9.5 Doubts about the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives
- 9.6 A Digression: The Fine-Grained Individuation Gambit
- 9.7 Why Injustice Makes an Outcome Worse
- 9.8 Comparison-Dependent vs Context-Dependent Goodness
- 9.9 Dynamic Choice and Worries about Money-Pumping
- 9.10 Conclusion
- Appendix: Extending the Solution to "Non-Overlapping" Cases
- 10: Saving Posterity from a Worse Fate
- 10.1 Introduction
- 10.2 Taxonomy
- 10.3 Same-People Choices
- 10.3.1 Trade-off Rules
- 10.3.2 Zero Embargo
- 10.3.3 Sufficiency
- 10.3.4 Equality and "Leveling Down"
- 10.3.5 Ties
- 10.3.6 Levels Not Losses
- 10.4 Contingent Same-Number Cases
- 10.5 Mixed Cases
- 10.6 Contingent Different-Number Cases Below Zero
- 10.7 Contingent Different-Number Cases Above Zero
- 10.8 Contingent Different-Number Cases Above and Below Zero
- 10.9 Conflicts with Benefit Thinking
- 10.9.1 Benefit Requires
- 10.9.2 Benefit Permits
- 10.9.3 The Sadistic Choice
- 10.10 Arguments for Benefit Thinking
- 10.10.1 Same-Number Cases
- 10.10.2 The End of Humanity
- 10.10.2.1 Interests of Non-contingent People
- 10.10.2.2 Impersonal Values
- 10.10.2.3 Agent-Relative Reasons
- 10.11 Incoherence
- 10.11.1 Separation
- 10.11.2 Negative Transitivity
- 10.11.3 Choice-Set Independence
- 10.11.4 Acyclicity
- 10.11.5 The Deontic and the Axiologic
- 10.12 Do We Need a Principle?
- 10.13 Ignoring the Unaffected
- 10.14 Comparison with Frick
- 10.15 Who Can Complain?
- 10.15.1 Complaint although Benefitted
- 10.15.2 Worse-Fate-as-Answer
- 11: Against Large Number Scepticism.
- 11.1
- 11.2
- 11.3
- 11.4
- 11.5
- 11.6
- 11.7
- 11.8
- 12: Are We Living at the Hinge of History?
- 12.1 Introduction
- 12.2 Two Worldviews
- 12.3 Making the Hinge of History Claim Precise
- 12.4 The Base Rates Argument against HH
- 12.5 The Inductive Argument against HH
- 12.6 Some Arguments for HH
- 12.6.1 Living on a Single Planet
- 12.6.2 Unusually Fast Economic and Technological Progress
- 12.6.3 Summing Up
- 12.7 Conclusion
- 13: On Theory X and What Matters Most
- 13.1 Background
- 13.1.1 The Absurd Conclusion
- 13.1.2 The Repugnant Conclusion
- 13.2 Parfit's Final Papers
- 13.2.1 The Non-Identity Problem
- 13.2.2 The Mere Addition Paradox
- 13.3 Applying Theory X
- 13.3.1 Ensuring Humanity's Survival
- 13.3.2 Managing Global Catastrophic Risk
- 13.3.3 Alleviating Poverty and Suffering
- 13.4 Conclusion
- PART III: EVALUATIVE IMPRECISION, INCOMMENSURABILITY, AND VAGUENESS IN VALUE
- 14: How to Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion
- 14.1 The Continuum Argument for the Repugnant Conclusion
- 14.2 Three Standard Structural Solutions to Continua Arguments
- 14.2.1 Incommensurability
- 14.2.2 Incomparability
- 14.2.3 Indeterminacy
- 14.3 Parfit's Solution: Imprecise Lexicality
- 14.4 Parity
- 14.5 Conclusion
- 15: Can Parfit's Appeal to Incommensurabilities in Value Block the Continuum Argument for the Repugnant Conclusion?
- 15.1 Introduction
- 15.2 Preparing the Ground-Informal Discussion
- 15.3 Preparing the Ground-Formal Framework
- 15.4 Enter Incommensurability
- 15.5 Assessing the Costs
- 15.6 Accounting for Persistence
- 15.7 Are We Home Then?
- Appendix
- 16: Population Ethics and Conflict-of-Value Imprecision
- 16.1 Introduction
- 16.2 Imprecision and Conflict-of-Value Imprecision.
- 16.3 The Quantity Sequence.
- Notes:
- This edition also issued in print: 2022.
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on print version record.
- Other Format:
- Print version: McMahan, Jeff Ethics and Existence
- ISBN:
- 0-19-264665-6
- 0-19-191531-9
- 0-19-264666-4
- 9780192646668
- OCLC:
- 1293240882
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.