2 options
The interpretation of tax treaties in relation to domestic gaars / Eivind Furuseth.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Furuseth, Eivind, 1975- author.
- Series:
- Doctoral series ; Volume 43.
- IBFD Doctoral series ; Volume 43
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Tax evasion (International law).
- Tax evasion.
- Double taxation--Treaties.
- Double taxation.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (353 pages) : illustrations.
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Amsterdam, The Netherlands : IBFD, 2018.
- Summary:
- This book analyses the relationship between tax treaties and domestic anti-avoidance rules, particularly whether a treaty restricts the application of domestic general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs).
- Contents:
- Cover
- IBFD Doctoral Series
- Title
- Copyright
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Part I: Introduction
- Chapter 1: Setting the Scene
- 1.1. The relationship between domestic anti-avoidance rules and tax treaties
- Chapter 2: Possible Ways of Dealing with a Potential Conflict between Domestic Anti-Avoidance Rules and Tax Treaties
- 2.1. Resolving the issue
- Chapter 3: Developing the Research Question
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. Circumventing domestic legislation without benefiting from a tax treaty
- 3.3. The benefit from the transaction/arrangement follows from the tax treaty
- 3.3.1. Use of domestic legislation as a tool to circumvent tax treaties
- 3.3.1.1. Introduction
- 3.3.1.2. A definition in the tax treaty covers the transaction
- 3.3.1.3. No definition covering the transaction in the tax treaty
- 3.3.2. Use of a tax treaty as a tool to circumvent domestic legislation
- 3.3.2.1. Treaty shopping
- 3.3.2.2. Directive shopping
- 3.3.2.3. Back-to-back transaction
- 3.3.2.4. Other distributive rule
- 3.4. The relevance of tax treaty GAARs and/or SAARs for the application of domestic anti-avoidance rules
- Chapter 4: Outline of the Book
- 4.1. Explanation
- Chapter 5: Legal Sources
- 5.1. Introduction
- 5.2. OECD Comm.
- 5.3. OECD reports and other reports
- 5.4. UN Comm. as a source of law in the interpretation of tax treaties based on the OECD MC
- 5.5. Domestic case law as a source of law
- Chapter 6: Delimitations
- 6.1. Tax evasion and sham
- 6.2. EU/EEA law
- 6.3. Analysis of domestic anti-avoidance rules
- 6.4. The concept of beneficial owner
- 6.5. Formalities
- Part II: OECD and UN Documents Relevant for the Applicability of Domestic Anti-Avoidance Rules in a Tax Treaty Situation
- Chapter 7: Introduction
- 7.1. The relationship between domestic anti-avoidance rules and tax treaties.
- Chapter 8: Historical Overview of OECD Comm. Art. 1 and UN Comm. Art. 1
- 8.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1
- 8.1.1. Abuse-of-treaty and domestic anti-avoidance rules
- 8.1.2. Object and purpose
- 8.1.3. Is there an inherent "guiding principle" in tax treaties?
- 8.1.4. 2003 OECD Comm. and BEPS
- 8.2. UN Comm. Art. 1
- 8.3. Summary
- Chapter 9: Interpretation of the Treaty in its Context: The OECD Comm. and the UN Comm.
- 9.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1 views on domestic anti-avoidance rules
- 9.1.1. OECD Comm. Art. 1 - In general
- 9.1.2. OECD's use of the term "facts" - Various interpretations
- 9.1.3. The applicability of domestic anti-avoidance rules in relation to articles in the OECD MC other than OECD MC Art. 1
- 9.1.4. The relevance of the OECD Comm. 2003 and 2017 revision for pre-2003 and pre-2017 treaties
- 9.1.4.1. Introduction
- 9.1.4.2. Changes in the Commentary relating to changes in the OECD MC
- 9.1.4.3. Changes in the Commentary without any changes in the OECD MC
- 9.2. UN Comm. Art. 1 views on domestic anti-avoidance rules
- 9.2.1. In general
- 9.2.2. Specific legislative anti-abuse rules found in domestic law
- 9.2.3. General legislative anti-abuse rules found in domestic law
- 9.2.4. Judicial doctrines that are part of domestic law
- 9.2.5. Specific anti-abuse rules found in tax treaties
- 9.2.6. General anti-abuse rules in tax treaties
- 9.2.7. The interpretation of tax treaty provisions
- 9.2.8. The applicability of domestic anti-avoidance rules in relation to other articles in the UN MC than UN MC Art. 1
- 9.2.9. 2001 UN Comm. vs 2011 UN Comm.
- 9.3. Differences and similarities between the OECD Comm. and the UN Comm. regarding Art. 1
- 9.4. Summary
- Chapter 10: Relevance of the Object and Purpose for the Interpretation of Tax Treaties
- 10.1. The legal background
- 10.2. The object and purpose of a tax treaty.
- 10.2.1. How to determine the object and purpose of a tax treaty?
- 10.2.2. More than one object and purpose of a tax treaty
- 10.2.3. GAARs applied in a tax treaty situation
- 10.2.3.1. Introduction
- 10.2.3.2. Increased risk of double taxation
- 10.2.3.3. Conflicting interests between the two main objects of the tax treaty
- 10.2.4. GAARs not applied in a tax treaty situation
- 10.2.5. GAARs applied but only to the extent that the domestic GAAR is in accordance with the guiding principle
- 10.3. Summary
- Chapter 11: The Guiding Principle in 2017 OECD Comm. Art. 1 Para. 61
- 11.1. Introduction
- 11.2. First condition of the guiding principle - Main purpose of the transaction is to secure a favourable tax position which would not have been possible without the transaction
- 11.2.1. The purpose test
- 11.2.2. The purpose of the transaction
- 11.3. Second condition of the guiding principle - Obtaining reduced taxation on the transaction or arrangement is contrary to the object and purpose of the relevant provision of the treaty
- 11.3.1. Introduction
- 11.3.2. Do the distributive rules have their "own" object and purpose?
- 11.3.3. Is double non-taxation an object of the treaty?
- 11.3.4. Summary
- 11.4. Summary
- Chapter 12: Observations on the OECD Comm.
- 12.1. In general
- Part III: Domestic GAAR/SAAR but no Treaty GAAR/SAAR
- Chapter 13: Introduction
- 13.1. Alternative ways of dealing with the issue
- Chapter 14: Use of Domestic Legislation to Circumvent Domestic Legislation without Benefiting from a Tax Treaty
- 14.1. Introduction
- 14.2. Without benefiting from the tax treaty - Domestic anti-avoidance rules outside the scope of the treaty?
- 14.3. Summary
- Chapter 15: The Benefit from the Transaction/Arrangement Follows from the Tax Treaty
- 15.1. Introduction.
- 15.2. Use of domestic legislation as a tool to circumvent tax treaties
- 15.2.1. Introduction
- 15.2.2. A definition in the tax treaty that covers the transaction
- 15.2.3. No definition in the tax treaty itself
- 15.3. Use of a tax treaty as a tool to circumvent domestic legislation
- 15.3.1. Introduction
- 15.3.2. Redetermination of a counterparty of a transaction
- 15.3.2.1. In general
- 15.3.2.2. Outbound situations
- 15.3.2.3. Inbound situations
- 15.3.2.4. The relevance of active income in the intermediate company
- 15.3.3. Recharacterization of a transaction
- 15.3.4. Secondary adjustment
- 15.4. Summary
- Chapter 16: The Potential Conflict Resolved in the Tax Treaty
- 16.1. Introduction
- 16.2. Which anti-avoidance rules are covered by the treaty provision?
- 16.3. Written or unwritten rules?
- 16.4. Only explicit anti-avoidance rules or also rules with anti-avoidance effect?
- 16.5. Amendment of domestic anti-avoidance legislation
- 16.6. Restricted by the guiding principle
- 16.7. Unilateral regulation of the applicability - Reciprocity
- 16.8. The consequence when some tax treaties expressly allow domestic anti-avoidance rules while others do not
- 16.9. Summary
- Chapter 17: Both Contracting States Agree on the Anti-Avoidance Situation
- 17.1. Introduction
- Part IV: The Relevance of a GAAR/SAAR in the Tax Treaty
- Chapter 18: GAARs in the Tax Treaty
- 18.1. Introduction
- 18.2. Does a tax treaty GAAR exclude the applicability of a domestic GAAR?
- 18.3. Tax treaty GAAR in some tax treaties but not all
- 18.4. Tax treaty GAARs and the abuse-of-treaty doctrine
- 18.5. Summary
- Chapter 19: SAARs in the Tax Treaty
- 19.1. Introduction
- 19.2. Does a tax treaty SAAR exclude the applicability of a domestic SAAR (which applies in the same way as the tax treaty SAAR but is also broader)?.
- 19.3. Does a tax treaty SAAR exclude the applicability of a domestic GAAR?
- 19.4. Summary
- Part V: Conclusions and Final Remarks
- Chapter 20: Conclusions
- 20.1. Introduction
- 20.2. Use of domestic legislation to circumvent domestic legislation without benefiting from a tax treaty
- 20.3. The benefit from the transaction/arrangement follows from the tax treaty
- 20.3.1. Introduction
- 20.3.2. Use of domestic legislation as a tool to circumvent tax treaties
- 20.3.3. Use of a tax treaty as a tool to circumvent domestic legislation
- 20.4. The relevance of tax treaty GAARs and/or SAARs for the application of domestic anti-avoidance rules
- Chapter 21: Final Remarks
- 21.1. Recommendation to resolve the potential conflict between domestic anti-avoidance rules and tax treaties
- 21.1.1. Specific provision in the tax treaty regulating the relationship between domestic anti-avoidance rules and the tax treaty
- 21.1.2. Include a GAAR in the OECD MC and UN MC
- 21.1.3. Clear statement in the OECD Comm.
- Bibliography
- Other Titles in the IBFD Doctoral Series.
- Notes:
- Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Oslo, 2016.
- Includes bibliographical references (pages [297]-329).
- Description based on print version record.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- ISBN:
- 90-8722-480-X
- OCLC:
- 1122616892
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.