3 options
The Australian Feminist Judgments Project : Righting and Re-writing Law.
- Format:
- Book
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Feminist jurisprudence.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (xxx, 462 pages)
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2015.
- Summary:
- This book brings together feminist academics and lawyers to present an impressive collection of alternative judgments in a series of Australian legal cases. By re-imagining original legal decisions through a feminist lens, the collection explores the possibilities, limits and implications of feminist approaches to legal decision-making. Each case is accompanied by a brief commentary that places it in legal and historical context and explains what the feminist rewriting does differently to the original case. The cases not only cover topics of long-standing interest to feminist scholars - such as family law, sexual offences and discrimination law - but also areas which have had less attention, including Indigenous sovereignty, constitutional law, immigration, taxation and environmental law. The collection contributes a distinctly Australian perspective to the growing international literature investigating the role of feminist legal theory in judicial decision-making
- Contents:
- 1 Introduction: Righting Australian Law
- Heather Douglas, Francesca Bartlett, Trish Luker and Rosemary Hunter
- 2 Reflections on Rewriting the Law
- Part I Public Law Constitutional Law
- 3 Kartinyeri v The Commonwealth [1998] HCA
- Commentary: Kathy Bowrey
- First Nations Stories, Grandmother's Law: Too Many Stories to Tell: Irene Watson
- 4 R v Pearson; Ex parte Sipka [1983] HCA 6
- Feminism and the Franchise: Elisa Arcioni
- Judgment: Kim Rubenstein
- 5 Dietrich v R [1992] HCA
- Commentary: Margaret Davies
- Judgment: Reg Graycar and Jenny Morgan
- Tax Law
- 6 Lodge v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1972] HCA
- Commentary: Ann O'Connell
- Judgment: Kerrie Sadiq
- Immigration Law
- 7 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs;Ex parte Applicants S134
- 2002 [2003] HCA 1
- Roqia's Story: Refugees and Natural Justice in the Court of Public Opinion: Mary Crock
- Judgment: Charlotte Steer
- 8 Appellant S395
- 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs[2003] HCA
- Commentary: Wayne Morgan
- Judgment: Nan Seuffert
- Environmental Law
- 9 Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland Proserpine
- Whitsunday Branch Inc v Minister for the Environment and Heritage [2006] FCA
- Addressing Climate Change Inequities: The Contribution of a Feminist Judgment: Jacqueline Peel
- Judgment: Lee Godden
- Part II Private Law
- Torts
- 10 Cattanach v Melchior [2003] HCA
- The Economic Value of Human Relationships: Cattanach v Melchior Revisited: Isabel Karpin
- Judgment: Kylie Burns
- Consumer Protection
- 11 ACCC v Keshow [2005] FCA
- Unconscionability, Education and Indigenous Women: Bronwyn Naylor
- Judgment: Heron Loban
- Equity
- 12 Louth v Diprose [1992] HCA 61
- Give and Take: Unconscionability and the Pervasiveness of Gender Stereotypes: Paula Baron
- Judgment: Francesca Bartlett
- 13 Trustees of the Property of John Daniel Cummins, a Bankrupt v Cummins [2006] HCA 6
- Formal Equality and Third Party Interests in the Family Home: Francesca Bartlett
- Judgment: Lisa Sarmas
- Part III Crime and Evidence
- Criminal Law
- 14 Parker v R [1963] HCA 14
- Reconsidering Precedent: Heather Douglas
- Judgment: Adrian Howe
- 15 Taikato v R [1996] HCA 28
- A Well-founded Fear? Giving Context to Self-defence: Julie Stubbs
- Judgment: Penny Crofts and Isabella Alexander
- 16 PGA v R [2012] HCA 21
- Admitting Legal Wrongs: Ngaire Naffine
- Judgment: Wendy Larcombe and Mary Heath
- Evidence
- 17 RPS v R [2000] HCA 3
- Commentary: Katherine Biber
- Judgment: Helen O'Sullivan
- 18 Phillips v R [2006] HCA 4
- Locating Consent in Similar-Fact Cases: Mehera San Roque
- Judgment: Annie Cossins
- Sentencing
- 19 R v Webster [1990] NSWSC 70012
- 90
- Truth in Sentencing: The Narration of Judgment: Kirsty Duncanson
- Judgment: Honni van Rijswijk and Lesley Townsley
- 20 R v Middendorp [2010] VSC 202
- Defensive Homicide: JaneMaree Maher
- Judgment: Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Danielle Tyson and Jude McCulloch
- 21 R v Morgan [2010] VSCA 15
- Intersectionality and Indigenous Sentencing Courts: Heather Douglas
- Judgment: Elena Marchetti and Janet Ransley
- Part IV Interpreting Equality
- Family Law
- 22 U v U [2002] HCA 36
- Commentary: Rachael Field
- Judgment: Jonathan Crowe
- 23 Goode and Goode [2006] FamCA 1
- The Practice of Feminist Judgment in Family Law: Ann Genovese
- Judgment: Zoe Rathus and Renata Alexander
- Discrimination Law
- 24 JM v QFG and GK [1998] QCA
- Commentary: Paula Gerber
- Judgment: Anita Stuhmcke
- 25 McLeod v Power [2003] FMCA 2
- Commentary: Katharine Gelber
- Judgment: Jennifer Nielsen
- 26 The State of New South Wales v Amery [2006] HCA 14
- The Indirection of Sex Discrimination: Margaret Thornton
- Judgment: Beth Gaze
- Treaty Law
- 27 In the matter of Djappari (Re Tuckiar) [2035] FNCA 1
- Commentary: Thalia Anthony
- Judgment: Nicole Watson
- Notes:
- Includes index.
- Other Format:
- Print version: Australian feminist judgments : righting and rewriting law.
- ISBN:
- 9781474201292
- 1474201296
- 9781782255406
- 1782255400
- OCLC:
- 907257953
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.