3 options
The neural basis of free will : criterial causation / Peter Ulric Tse.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Tse, Peter Ulric, 1962-
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Cognitive neuroscience.
- Neuropsychology.
- Science--Philosophy.
- Science.
- Free will and determinism.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (473 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c2013.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- The issues of mental causation, consciousness, and free will have vexed philosophers since Plato. In this book, Peter Tse examines these unresolved issues from a neuroscientific perspective.
- Contents:
- 1. Introduction: The Mind-Body Problem Will Be Solved by Neuroscience
- 2. Overview of the Arguments
- 3. A Criterial Neuronal Code Underlies Downward Mental Causation and Free Will
- What Is Will?
- What Is Criterial Causation?
- 4. Neurons Impose Physical and Informational Criteria for Firing on Their Inputs
- How Can Neurons Realize Informational Criteria?
- The Bottom-Up Information-Processing Hierarchy for Visual Recognition
- Decision Making and Action
- Attention and Top-Down Modulation of Bottom-Up Processing
- Basic Issues in Neuronal Information Processing: Balancing Excitation and Inhibition
- Tonic versus Phasic Firing
- The Sweet Spot of Neural Criticality
- Synchrony among inhibitory Interneurons
- Attentional Binding and Gamma Oscillations
- Attentional Binding by Neuronal Bursting
- Neural Epiconnectivity and Rapid Synaptic Resetting
- Amplifying Microscopic Randomness to Spike Timing Variability
- 5. NMDA Receptors and a Neuronal Code Based on Bursting
- Spiny and Nonspiny Neurons
- The NMDA Receptor
- Long-Term Potentiation Is Not the Mechanism of Rapid Synaptic Plasticity
- Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity
- The Role of Back-Propagating Action Potentials in Rapid Synaptic Plasticity and Bursting
- A Neuronal Burst Code
- Attentional Binding by Bursting: The Role of Cholinergic Feedback
- Attentional Binding by Bursting: The Role of Noncholinergic Feedback
- Conclusion
- 6. Mental Causation as an Instance of Criterial Causation
- Criterial Causation and the Detection of Patterns in Input
- Criterial Causation: Multiple Realizability Is Not Enough
- Addressing Kim's Challenge
- There Is No Backward Causation in Criterial Causation
- Criterial Causation Is a Causation of Pattern-Released Activity
- 7. Criterial Causation Offers a Neural Basis for Free Will
- Strong Free Will
- Criterial Causation Escapes the Basic Argument against Free Will
- James and Incompatibilist Physicalist Libertarianism
- Decision Making and Choice
- 8. Implications of Criterial Causality for Mental Representation
- The Neural Code Is Not Algorithmic
- Criterialism, Descriptivism, and Reference
- Countering Kripke's Attack
- Wittgenstein and Criteria
- Propositions and Vectorial Encodings
- Mental Operations versus Mental Representations
- Beyond Functionalism
- 9. Barking Up the Wrong Free: Readiness Potentials and the Role of Conscious Willing
- Libet's Experiments Do Not Disprove the Possibility of Free Will
- Is Conscious Willing Causal?
- Illusions of Volitional Efficacy
- 10. The Roles of Attention and Consciousness in Criterial Causation
- Why Are There Qualia?
- Iconic versus Working Memory
- Stage 1 Qualia as Precompiled Informational Outputs of Preconscious Operations
- Qualia as a Shared Format for Endogenous Attentional Operations
- Experience Is for Endogenously Attending, Doing, and Planning
- Volitional Attentional Tracking Requires Consciousness
- If an Animal Can Attentionally Track, Is it Conscious?
- Volitional Attention Can Alter Qualia
- Qualia and Chunking: Types of Qualia
- Qualia and the Frontoparietal Network
- The Superpositionality of Qualia
- Zombies Are Impossible
- Tying It All Together.
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
- Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
- ISBN:
- 0-262-31316-2
- 1-299-18463-4
- 0-262-31315-4
- OCLC:
- 827944890
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.