My Account Log in

1 option

The rights paradox : how group attitudes shape US Supreme Court legitimacy / Michael A. Zilis, University of Kentucky.

Cambridge eBooks: Frontlist 2021 Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Zilis, Michael A., author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
United States. Supreme Court--Public opinion.
United States.
Minorities--Legal status, laws, etc--United States.
Minorities.
Aversion--Political aspects--United States.
Aversion.
School integration--Law and legislation--United States.
School integration.
Legitimacy of governments--United States.
Legitimacy of governments.
Minorities--Civil rights--United States.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (xviii, 176 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Place of Publication:
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Summary:
The US Supreme Court is the chief institution responsible for guarding minority rights and equality under the law, yet, in order to function authoritatively, the Court depends on a majority of Americans to accept its legitimacy and on policymakers to enforce its rulings. The Rights Paradox confronts this tension, offering a careful conceptualization and theory of judicial legitimacy that emphasizes its connection to social groups. Zilis demonstrates that attitudes toward minorities and other groups are pivotal for shaping popular support for the Court, with the Court losing support when it rules in favor of unpopular groups. Moreover, justices are aware of these dynamics and strategically moderate their decisions when concerned about the Court's legitimacy. Drawing on survey and experimental evidence, as well as analysis of Court decision-making across many recent high-profile cases, Zilis examines the implications for 'equal justice under the law' in an era of heightened polarization and conflict.
Contents:
Legitimacy and minority rights
The group antipathy theory of Supreme Court legitimacy
Under siege : gay rights and immigration at the Supreme Court
Opening the floodgates : big business, citizens united, and evaluations
Experimental tests of the group antipathy model
How citizens use groups to evaluate judicial preferences
Group antipathy and strategic behavior on the Supreme Court.
Notes:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 22 Feb 2021).
ISBN:
1-108-93434-X
1-108-93510-9
1-108-93776-4
OCLC:
1201695976

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account