1 option
Standing up for justice : the challenges of trying atrocity crimes / Theodor Meron.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Meron, Theodor, 1930- author.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- International criminal courts.
- Atrocities--Law and legislation.
- Atrocities.
- Judicial process.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource
- Edition:
- First edition.
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford, England ; New York, New York : Oxford University Press, [2021]
- Summary:
- Judge Theodor Meron addresses the key questions facing the international criminal justice system, drawing on two decades of experience as an international judge and a distinguished academic career. He provides insights into judicial independence and the principle of fairness in trying cases before international criminal courts and tribunals.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Preface
- PART I: SETTING THE SCENE
- I. Roots: The Road to Judgeship
- The Holocaust
- And Life Goes On
- The Palestine Opinions
- In Academia
- The International Committee of the Red Cross
- The Dauchy Case
- The State Department
- Judgeships
- Shakespeare
- Oxford
- Looking Back
- II. From Classroom to a Criminal Courtroom
- III. Moving from Nuremberg to The Hague
- The Necessity to Establish a Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
- State of the Law: The Example of Rape
- Non-International Armed Conflicts
- Nuremberg Proceedings
- Moving Forward with the Law and Due Process
- Justifying International Criminal Tribunals
- PART II: PRINCIPLES, GOALS, PROCESSES
- IV. The Rule of Law, the Principle of Legality and Due Process
- The Rule of Law
- Reifying Rule of Law Principles
- Principle of Legality
- Selective Accountability
- Due Process
- V. Trying Violations of Human Rights in International Criminal Tribunals
- Post-World War II Changes
- The Establishment of International Criminal Tribunals
- Common Article 3 and Crimes Against Humanity
- Persecution
- VI. Judicial Independence and Impartiality
- Why Judicial Independence Matters
- Ensuring an Independent Judiciary
- Judicial Selection
- Should Judges Respond to Outside Criticism?
- Judicial Assignments and Court Presidents
- Judicial Bias and Recusal
- Institutional Design and Management
- The Presidency and the Prosecution
- Communicating with the Public
- Rules and Obstructive Behavior of Defendants
- The Saga of the Turkish Judge Akay
- VII. Judicial Decision-Making and Deliberations
- Decision-Making
- The uniqueness of the Tribunals
- Decision-makers
- Judges and staff-background
- Judges-processes
- The Deliberation Process at International Criminal Tribunals.
- Civil Law and Common Law Courts
- Deliberations at the ICTY/ICTR Appeals Chambers
- Appeals from Judgements
- Before the hearing
- The hearing
- After the hearing
- Sentencing deliberations
- Separate/dissenting opinions
- Interlocutory appeals, pre-appeal decisions and petitions for review
- Deliberations at the Trial Chambers
- Challenges for the Mechanism
- VIII. Keeping POWs Safe: The Ovčara Massacre
- IX. General Gotovina: A Controversial Acquittal
- The Background
- I. Excerpts from the Appeals Chamber Majority Judgement of Acquittal of Gotovina
- II. A Separate Opinion on Alternate Modes of Liability
- III. Judgement of the ICJ Supporting the Gotovina Majority Decision
- PART III: SELECTED DECISIONS
- X. Fleshing Out Principles of Fairness
- Prosecutor v. Ngirabatware
- Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Galić
- Renzaho v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanović and Kubura
- Prosecutor v. Šešelj
- Prosecutor v. Mladić
- Slobodan Milošević v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević
- Zigiranyirazo v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Prlić, Stojić, Praljak, Petković, Ćorić and Pušić
- Prosecutor v. Karadžić
- Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Ntahobali, Nsabimana, Nteziryayo, Kanyabashi and Ndayambaje
- Mugenzi and Mugiraneza v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolić
- Prosecutor v. Bralo
- Ntabakuze v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Mrkšić, Šljivančanin
- XI. Writing Separately: My Dissenting and Concurring Opinions
- Bagosora and Nsengiyumva v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Strugar
- Prosecutor v. Halilović
- Gacumbitsi v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Gotovina and Markač.
- Prosecutor v. Brđanin
- Muvunyi v. The Prosecutor
- Prosecutor v. Stakić
- XII. Early Release of Prisoners Decisions
- Background
- Key Early Release Decisions
- Prosecutor v. Bisengimana
- Prosecutor v. Ntakirutimana
- Prosecutor v. Lazarević
- Prosecutor v. Beara
- Prosecutor v. Kunarac
- Prosecutor v. Simba
- Prosecutor v. Ćorić
- EPILOGUE
- XIII. The Road Ahead: Does International Justice Work?
- Invigorate the New Era of Accountability
- Close the Accountability Gap
- Comply with Existing Obligations
- Encourage and Invigorate Prosecutions under the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction
- Review and Revise Laws and Practices to Ensure Due Process, Fair Trials and Judicial Independence
- Invest in Justice Infrastructure
- Consider and Support Regional Accountability Initiatives
- Develop Innovative Solutions to Foster Greater Accountability- and Revisit or Recycle Past Approaches Where Appropriate
- Foreswear Amnesties and Targeted Immunities
- Sustain Support for and Cooperation with Existing Accountability Mechanisms
- Tackle Apathy, Intransigence and the Absence of Political Will
- Measure Success
- Reflecting on my Personal Journey
- Index.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- Description based on print version record.
- Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
- Other Format:
- Print version:
- ISBN:
- 0-19-260862-2
- 0-19-189585-7
- OCLC:
- 1224020565
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.