My Account Log in

2 options

Kind Words, Cruise Missiles, and Everything in Between : The Use of Power Resources in U.S. Policies towards Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus 1989–2008 / Barbara Kunz, Andreas Umland, William Hill

EBSCOhost Academic eBook Collection (North America) Available online

View online

Ebook Central Academic Complete Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Kunz, Barbara, Author.
Contributor:
Umland, Andreas Dr., Editor.
Hill, William, Author of introduction, etc.
Series:
Soviet and post-Soviet politics and society.
Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 174
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
USA.
Poland.
Belorussia.
Local Subjects:
USA.
Poland.
Belorussia.
Physical Description:
1 online resource (291 pages) : illustrations.
Edition:
1st ed.
Place of Publication:
Hannover ibidem 2017
Biography/History:
Barbara Kunz is a Research Fellow at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri). She specializes in Euro-Atlantic security affairs with a special emphasis on Franco-German security and defense cooperation and security dynamics in the Baltic Sea region. Barbara Kunz holds a PhD from Stockholm University and is a graduate of Sciences Po, Paris.
Summary:
According to general Realist premises, after the end of the Cold War, the United States took an interest in remaining the only super power. Accordingly, it was attempting to maintain and manage unipolarity. The pursuit of this Grand Strategy, however, required the U.S. to adapt its various strategies to the various receiving states. Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus played very unalike roles in that configuration: Whilst Poland was labeled “America’s best friend” by President George W. Bush, Belarus was not seeking alignment with the U.S., whereas Ukraine-U.S. relations were subject to many ups and downs. The three countries’ diverging attitudes towards Washington led to very different policy approaches from a U.S. vantage point. As this study shows, the U.S. did not have an overall strategy for the region. Rather, Washington managed its relations with European states through a set of mainly bilateral relations. Madeleine Albright once described the tools of foreign policy as including “everything from kind words to cruise missiles”. This book is a comparative case study of the United States’ use of these tools in its approaches towards Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus after the end of the Cold War. As the “only remaining superpower”, Washington played a key role in the formation of post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. Yet, its actions and policies have received comparatively little attention. This book contributes to filling that gap by providing three in-depth case studies.
Contents:
Intro
Preface
Contents
Abbreviations
I Introduction
I.1 The background
I.1.1 Preserving the unipolar moment
I.1.2 On the ground: the U.S. in Central and Eastern Europe
I.2 Empirical objectives
II The theoretical framework and methodology
II.1 Introduction and research questions
II.1.1 Neoclassical realism: an introduction
II.1.2 Elite perceptions: of more than just the system?
II.2 Non-friends, friends and undecided states
II.2.1 Non-friends
II.2.2 Friends
II.2.3 Concluding remarks: undecided states
II.3 Two types of power resources and foreign policy tools
II.3.1 Power in political realism
II.3.2 Positive and negative power: the relevance of base values
II.3.3 Negative power and its bases
II.3.4 Positive power and its bases
II.3.5 Power resources and foreign policy tools
II.4 Linking states' friend / non-friend / undecided status to power
II.5 Concluding remarks on the theoretical framework
II.6 Methodological considerations
II.6.1 The cases
II.6.2 Sources
II.6.3 Research design: Comparative case studies
II.6.4 Three steps in addressing the sources
III U.S. Foreign Policies Towards Poland
III.1 Introduction
III.2 Laying the foundations: the U.S. and Solidarność
III.2.1 Accompanying Poland to de facto independence 1989-1991
III.2.2 Foreign Policy Tools in Solidarność-times
III.3 An emerging new best friend in Europe: the second Gulf War and NATO enlargement
III.3.1 Euro-Atlantic integration or: Overcoming Yalta
III.3.2 Foreign policy tools 1991 to 2000
III.4 The heydays and their aftermath: 2001 onwards
III.4.1 State Tourism: Bush, Kwaśniewski and the Iraq war
III.4.2 Foreign policy tools 2001 to 2005
III.5 After Kwaśniewski: 2005 onwards
III.5.1 The double Kaczyński era.
III.5.2 Donald Tusk, the conclusion of the Missile Defence Agreement-and still no visa waiver programme
III.5.3 Foreign policy tools after Kwaśniewski
III.6 Conclusions on U.S. foreign policies towards Poland 1989-2008
IV U.S. Foreign Policies Towards Ukraine
IV.1 Introduction: America's recognition of Ukraine's independence
IV.2 The early years: Moscow-centrism and a focus on nuclear non-proliferation 1991 to 1994
IV.2.1 Solving the nuclear question
IV.2.2 The Lisbon Protocol and Ukraine's accession to the NPT as a nuclear-free state
IV.2.3 Foreign Policy Tools in solving the nuclear question
IV.3 Conventional non-proliferation: Ukraine's accession to the MTCR, Bushehr and the Satellite Deal 1994 to 1998
IV.3.1 Getting Ukraine to join the MTCR
IV.3.2 The Policy of issue linkage: non-proliferation, nuclear power plants and satellites
IV.3.3 Foreign Policy Tools in making Ukraine join the MTCR
IV.4 Euro-Atlantic integration: Ukraine in its wider context 1994 to 2004
IV.4.1 The U.S.-Ukrainian honeymoon: broadening relations
IV.4.2 Setbacks and frustration
IV.4.3 Multilateralising Ukraine's transformation: Ukraine and NATO
IV.4.4 Foreign Policy Tools in promoting Ukraine's Euro-Atlantic integration
IV.5 After the Orange Revolution: diminished U.S. interest 2004 to 2008
IV.5.1 Few illusions left: the Orange Revolution and its aftermath
IV.5.2 Foreign policy tools 2004 to 2008
IV.6 Conclusions on U.S. foreign policies towards Ukraine
V U.S. Foreign Policies Towards Belarus
V.1 Introduction: At odds with the West
V.2 Belarus and the US: the early years
V.2.1 Belarus: The unproblematic answer to the nuclear question
V.2.2 Foreign policy tools in early U.S.-Belarusian relations
V.3 Lukashenka and "Selective Engagement "with Minsk.
V.3.1 Rigged elections and referenda: Deteriorating relations
V.3.2 The Belarus Democracy Act
V.3.3 Political Prisoners, Sanctions and Personae Non Gratae
V.3.4 "Selective engagement" and foreign policy tools
V.4 The wider context: Belarus in international politics
V.4.1 The Bush II era: Belarus as a rogue state?
V.4.2 Belarus and Euro-Atlantic Integration
V.4.3 The wider context and foreign policy tools
V.5 Conclusions on U.S. foreign policies towards Belarus 1991-2008
VI Conclusions
VI.1 Returning to the research questions
VI.2 Empirical findings: U.S. post-Cold War policies towards Poland, Ukraine and Belarus
VI.3 Implications for theory building: linking status to power
VI.3.1 Friends, non-friends and undecided states: an element of the missing link
VI.3.2 A category of its own: undecided states
VI.3.3 Positive and negative power as means to shape and control the environment
VI.4 Final remarks
Annex
High-level contacts between the U.S. and Poland, Ukraine and Belarus
References
Primary Sources
Speeches, Press Releases and Briefings*
Background Notes
Treaties, Laws, Reports and Official Strategies
Websites
Books and Articles
Media Sources.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
9783838270654
3838270657
Publisher Number:
9783838270654

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account