Foreign relations law / Curtis A. Bradley.

Format:

Book

Contributor:

Bradley, Curtis A., editor.

Edward Elgar Publishing, publisher.

Series:

International law (Edward Elgar)

Elgar research reviews in law.

International law series

Elgar research reviews in law

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

International law.

Executive agreements.

International relations.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (pages).

Place of Publication:

Northampton, Massachusetts : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.

Summary:

This insightful research review provides an analysis of the modern literature on foreign relations law. The topics explored include; the history of foreign relations law, the role of the courts in adjudicating foreign affairs disputes, executive power over foreign affairs, the domestic status of treaties, the phenomenon of executive agreements, the judicial application of customary international law, and the distribution of authority over war powers. The review provides a unique birds-eye view of the entire field and promises to be an invaluable tool for academics as well as a fascinating read for those interested in the subject.

Contents:

1. G. Edward White (1999), 'The Transformation of the Constitutional Regime of Foreign Relations', Virginia Law Review, 85 (1), February, 1-150

2. Ganesh Sitaraman and Ingrid Wuerth (2015), 'The Normalization of Foreign Relations Law', Harvard Law Review, 128 (7), 1897-979

3. Curtis A. Bradley (2015), 'Foreign Relations Law and the Purported Shift Away From "Exceptionalism"', Harvard Law Review, 86 (2), March, 294-304

4. Harold Hongju Koh (1988), 'Why the President (Almost) Always Wins in Foreign Affairs: Lessons of the Iran-Contra Affair', Yale Law Journal, 97 (7), June, 1255-1342

5. Eric A. Posner and Cass R. Sunstein (2007), 'Chevronizing Foreign Relations Law', Yale Law Journal, 116 (6), April, 1170-1228

6. Derek Jinks and Neal Kumar Katyal (2007), 'Disregarding Foreign Relations Law', Yale Law Journal, 116 (6), April, 1230-83

7. Michael J. Glennon (1988), 'Two Views of Presidential Foreign Affairs Power: Little v. Barreme or Curtis-Wright?', Yale Journal of International Law, 13 (5), November, 5-20

8. Saikrishna B. Prakash and Michael D. Ramsey (2001), 'The Executive Power over Foreign Affairs', Yale Law Journal, 111 (2), November, 231-356

9. Curtis A. Bradley and Martin S. Flaherty (2004), 'Executive Power Essentialism and Foreign Affairs', Michigan Law Review, 102, February, 545-688

10. Carlos Manuel Vázquez (1995), 'The Four Doctrines of Self-Executing Treaties', American Journal of International Law, 89 (4), February, 695-723

11. Curtis A. Bradley (2008), 'Self-Execution and Treaty Duality', Supreme Court Review, 1, 131-82 [52]

1. Curtis A. Bradley (1998), 'The Treaty Power and American Federalism', Michigan Law Review, 97, 390-461

2. Duncan B. Hollis (2006), 'Executive Federalism: Forging New Federalist Constraints on the Treaty Power', Southern California Law Review, 79, April, 1327-95

3. Bruce Ackerman and David Golove (1995), 'Is NAFTA Constitutional?', Harvard Law Review, 108 (4), February, 799-929

4. Oona A. Hathaway (2008), 'Treaties' End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United States', Yale Law Journal, 117, April, 1236-1372

5. Curtis A. Bradley and Jack L. Goldsmith (1997), 'Customary International Law As Federal Common Law: A Critique of The Modern Position', Harvard Law Review, 110 (4), February, 815-76

6. Harold Hongju Koh (1998), 'Is International Law Really State Law?', Harvard Law Review, 111 (7), May, 1824-61

7. Curtis A. Bradley and Jack L. Goldsmith (1998), 'Federal Courts and The Incorporation of International Law', Harvard Law Review, 111 (8), June, 2260-75

8. John Hart Ely (1988), 'Suppose Congress Wanted a War Powers Act That Worked', Columbia Law Review, 88 (7), 1379-1431

9. John C. Yoo (1996), 'The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers', California Law Review, 84 (2), March, 167-305

10. Michael D. Ramsey (2002), 'Textualism and War Powers', University of Chicago Law Review, 69, October, 1543-1638

Notes:

Includes bibliographical references.

Description based on print record.

ISBN:

1-78811-528-7