My Account Log in

1 option

Necessity and proportionality in international peace and security law / edited by Claus Kress and Robert Lawless.

Oxford Scholarship Online: Law Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Contributor:
Lieber Institute for Law and Land Warfare (United States Military Academy), sponsoring body.
Kress, Claus, editor.
Lawless, Robert (Lawyer), editor.
Series:
Lieber studies ; Volume 5.
The Lieber studies ; Volume 5
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
War (International law).
Physical Description:
1 online resource (488 pages).
Place of Publication:
New York, New York : Oxford University Press, [2021]
System Details:
text file PDF
Summary:
There are legal limits on the circumstances under which states may use military force to address a perceived or actual threat. The concepts of necessity and proportionality are central to these limitations imposed by the law. This text explores the many ways in which necessity and proportionality arise in the law on the modern battlefield, which is rapidly changing, complex, and ambiguous.
Contents:
Necessity and proportionality in morality and law / Jeff McMahan
On the continuous and concurrent application of ad Bellum and in Bello Proportionality / Eliav Lieblich
The essential link between proportionality and necessity in the exercise of self-defense / Geoffrey S. Corn
The unwilling and unable test for extraterritorial defensive force : why force is permitted against the territorial state / Jens David Ohlin
Drones programs, the individualization of war, and the ad Bellum Principle of Proportionality / Rebecca Mignot-Mahdavi
The quest for an internal Jus ad Bellum : international law's missing link, mere distraction, or Pandora's Box? / Tom Ruys
Article 51's reporting requirement as a space for legal argument and factfulness / Larissa van den Herik
Sequences in military necessity for the Jus in Bello / Dino Kritsiotis
Practical and conceptual challenges to doctrinal military necessity / Robert Lawless
Considerations of necessity under Article 57(2)(a)(ii), (c), and (3) and proportionality under Article 51(5)(b) and Article 57(2)(b) of additional Protocol I : is there room for an integrated approach? / Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg
Specifying the proportionality test and the standard of due precaution : problems of prognostic assessment in determining the meaning of "may be expected" and "anticipated" / Stefan Oeter
The proportionality rule and mental health harm in war / Sarah Knuckey, Alex Moorehead, Audrey McCalley, and Adam Brown
Towards the special computer law of targeting : "fully autonomous" weapons systems and the proportionality test / Masahiro Kurosaki
The duty to pay reparations for the violation of the prohibition of the use of force in international relations and the Jus Post Bellum / Elisabeth Günnewig.
Notes:
Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on October 10, 2021)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Includes index.
Description based on print version record.
ISBN:
0-19-753738-3
0-19-753740-5
0-19-753739-1

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account