My Account Log in

2 options

Agreement beyond Phi / Shigeru Miyagawa.

MIT Press Direct (eBooks) Available online

View online

MIT Press Direct OA Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Miyagawa, Shigeru, author.
Series:
Linguistic inquiry monographs ; 75.
Linguistic inquiry monographs ; 75
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Grammar, Comparative and general--Agreement.
Grammar, Comparative and general.
Japanese language--Agreement.
Japanese language.
Japanese language--Syntax.
Discourse markers.
Government-binding theory (Linguistics).
Minimalist theory (Linguistics).
Physical Description:
1 online resource.
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Massachusetts : The MIT Press, [2017]
System Details:
text file
Summary:
An argument that agreement and agreementless languages are unified under an expanded view of grammatical features including both phi-features and certain discourse configurational features.
Contents:
1 Introduction: Strong Uniformity 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Strong Uniformity: An Instantiation of the Uniformity Principle 2
1.2.1 Examples of Typology Based on Strong Uniformity 3
1.2.1.1 δ-Feature al T 5
1.2.1.2 Agreement at C: Dinka 9
1.3 Outline of the Monograph 10
2.1 Agreement at C: Japanese 19
2.2 Allocutive Agreement 22
2.2.1 Politeness Marking in Japanese as Allocutive Agreement 26
2.2.2 Further Evidence for the Speech Act Projection: Jingpo and Newari 30
2.2.2.1 Jingpo 30
2.2.2.2 Newari 32
2.3 Two Counterexamples 34
2.4 Root Phenomena 36
2.4.1 Attitudinal and Style Adverbs in English 42
2.4.2 The Relative Clause: Another Root 44
2.5 Types of Topicalization 45
2.6 Topicalization and Relative Clauses 53
2.7 Conclusion 55
3 Pro-Drop, E-Type Pronouns, and Agreement 57
3.1 Introduction 57
3.2 Agreement in Chinese 61
3.2.1 Anaphor Binding and Blocking 64
3.2.2 Subject pro in Chinese 68
3.2.3 Chinese Subject pro as a Weak Pronoun 73
3.2.4 On J. Huang's (1984) Generalized Control Rule 75
3.3 Malayalam 77
3.3.1 Binding of Taan 'Self/You' 77
3.3.2 Blocking 78
3.4 Toward a Unified Analysis 80
3.4.1 Unified Account Based on pro 81
3.4.2 Evidence That the Sloppy Interpretation Cannot Be Due to Argument Ellipsis 83
3.4.3 On Hoji (1998) 85
3.5 E-Type Pronouns and Agreement 86
3.6 Large-Scale Survey of Chinese and Japanese Speakers for Sloppy Interpretation 91
3.6.1 Japanese Study 92
3.6.2 Chinese Study 95
3.7 Anaphoric Binding in Japanese and POV 98
3.8 Conclusion 102
4 On the Distribution and Structure of 'Why' 105
4.1 Introduction 105
4.2 'Why' as a Base-Generated Wh-Adjunct 107
4.2.1 A Gap in the Paradigm 107
4.3 Three Observations about Naze 'Why' 111
4.4 'Why' Moves (Shlonsky and Soare 2011) 114
4.4.1 Problem for the External-Merge Hypothesis: 'Why' Apparently Always Moves 115
4.4.2 Evidence from Chinese for 'Why' Movement 118
4.5 The Structure of 'Why' 119
4.6 Anti-Superiority and the Structure of 'Why' 121
4.7 Evidence That Naze Can Occur Low in the Structure 124
4.8 The Two-Tier Movement Analysis of 'Why' 127
4.8.1 Why Chinese Does Not Have the Two-Tier Movement of 'Why' 132
4.9 Use of 'What' for 'Why' 134
4.9.1 'What' Adjunct Questions in Japanese 135
4.10 On the Double-0 Constraint and the Nani-o 'What' Construction 140
4.10.1 Double-0 Constraint 142
4.10.2 Surface DOC, Deep DOC 144
4.10.3 Nani-o and the DOC 146
4.11 Conclusion 148
5 Ga/No Conversion, Strong Uniformity, and Focus 149
5.1 Introduction 149
5.2 Miyagawa (2013) 150
5.3 D-Licensing of the Genitive Case 151
5.4 A Different Kind of Genitive: Genitive of Dependent Tense 154
5.4.1 Dependent Tense and the Genitive 156
5.5 Strong Uniformity and Scrambling 160
5.6 Focus and Genitive 163
5.6.1 Focus at ν 165
5.7 Activation of the δ-Feature 166
5.7.1 Focus and Case (Miyagawa, Nishioka, and Zeijlstra 2016) 168
5.7.2 Ga/No Conversion, Focus, and Case Agreement 174
5.7.3 Ga/No Conversion and Focus on Internal Arguments 175
5.8 Ga/No Conversion and Interpretation 177
5.9 Conclusion 179
6 Concluding Remarks 181.
Notes:
OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
ISBN:
9780262338639
0262338637
OCLC:
979858422
Access Restriction:
Open Access Unrestricted online access

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account