My Account Log in

1 option

Women, language and politics / Sylvia Shaw, University of Westminster.

Van Pelt Library HQ1236 .S48 2020
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Shaw, Sylvia, 1969- author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Women--Political activity.
Women.
Women politicians.
Sex role--Political aspects.
Sex role.
Feminism--Political aspects.
Feminism.
Sexism in political culture.
Male domination (Social structure).
Physical Description:
xix, 319 pages : illustrations (black and white) ; 24 cm
Place of Publication:
Cambridge ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Summary:
"On the 7th February 2017, Senator Mitch McConnell read the statement below in an attempt to justify the silencing of Senator Elizabeth Warren's earlier speech in the US Senate: Senator Warren was giving a lengthy speech. She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted. (Senator Mitch McConnell, U.S, Senate on 7th February 2017)1 This statement and subsequent reactions to it encapsulate many of the issues raised in this study of women, language and politics. First, it is a statement made by a man in a political institution referring to invoking formal rules to justify the collective and institutional silencing of the speech of a woman politician, having already silenced her on the floor of the chamber by a series of interruptions. Second, it is about the interpretation and application of institutional rules as a controlling mechanism with which to silence. Elizabeth Warren's speech had criticised the appointment of Jeff Sessions as US Attorney General by reading out previous objections to his appointment as a federal court judge in 19862. The citing of these objections to Sessions' appointment was deemed to have broken a rule3 which prohibits ascribing to a Senator any 'conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator'. However, the application of these rules is not clear-cut and involves subjective judgements, with this particular rule being conventionally viewed as an edict that is rarely enforced (Jacobson 2017). Further doubt about the enforcement of the rule rested on the fact that a male colleague of Warren's subsequently read out the same objections from 1986 on the floor of the senate - in full and without censure4"-- Provided by publisher.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (pages 283-313) and index.
Other Format:
ebook version :
ISBN:
9781107080881
1107080886
OCLC:
1123186502

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account