2 options
The sourcebook of listening research : methodology and measures / edited by Debra Worthington and Graham Bodie.
- Format:
- Book
- Series:
- THEi Wiley ebooks.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Listening.
- Listening comprehension.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (638 pages) : illustrations
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Hoboken, New Jersey : Wiley Blackwell, 2018.
- System Details:
- Access using campus network via VPN at home (THEi Users Only).
- Summary:
- Winner of the 2018 Distinguished Book Award from the Communication and Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association. Essential reading for listening researchers across a range of disciplines, The Sourcebook of Listening Research: Methodology and Measures is a landmark publication that defines the field of listening research and its best practices. the definitive guide to listening methodology and measurement with contributions from leading listening scholars and researchers Evaluates current listening methods and measures, with attention to scale development, qualitative methods, operationalizing cognitive processes, and measuring affective and behavioral components A variety of theoretical models for assessing the cognitive, affective, and behavioral facets of listening are presented alongside 65 measurement profiles Outlines cutting-edge trends in listening research, as well as the complexities involved in performing successful research in this area
- Contents:
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Section One Decisions for the Measurement of Listening
- Chapter 1 Defining Listening: A Historical, Theoretical, and Pragmatic Assessment
- Listening: Distinctions and Definitions
- The Role of Theory in Listening Research
- Using This Book
- References
- Section Two Methodological Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities in Listening Research
- Chapter 2 Measuring Listening
- Define and Operationalize the Phenomenon
- Operationalization
- Develop the Initial Measures
- Develop a Validity Portfolio (Including Evidence of Score Reliability)
- Reporting Numerical Data
- Conclusion
- Chapter 3 Qualitative Approaches and Listening Research
- Characteristics of Qualitative Inquiry
- Qualitative Methodologies
- "Doing" Ethnography
- Chapter 4 Modeling and Measuring Cognitive Components of Listening
- Modeling Listening
- Cognitive Components
- New Horizons
- Chapter 5 Measuring Affective Components of Listening
- Self-Report Measurement
- The Uses and Abuses of Self-Report Methods in Listening Research
- Self-Reports of Listening: What Are They Good For?
- New Horizons: Daily Diaries and Experience Sampling Methods
- Chapter 6 Measuring Behavioral Components of Listening
- From Listening as Internal to Listening as Overt Behavior
- Defining Behavior
- Designing a Behavioral Listening Study
- Thinking About Listening Behavior in Concrete or Abstract Terms
- Analyzing Behavioral Data
- New Horizons for Behavioral Listening Research
- Section Three Measurement Profiles
- Profile 1 The Academic Listening Self-rating Questionnaire (ALSA)
- Construct
- Instrument Type
- Description
- Administration
- Scoring
- Development.
- Reliability
- Validity
- Availability
- Sample Studies
- Critique
- Scale
- Profile 2 Active - Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): (Drollinger, Comer, &
- Warrington, 2006
- also Bodie, 2011)
- Development
- Reliability
- Profile 3 Active Listening Attitude Scale (ALAS)
- Further Reading
- Profile 4 Active Listening Observation Scale (ALOS)
- Profile 5 Affectionate Communication Scale (TAS) (Trait-Given &
- Trait-Received): (Floyd, 2002)
- Profile 6 Affectionate Communication Index (ACI)
- Profile 7 Attributional Complexity Scale (ACS)
- Profile 8 Audio Message Complexity: Audio Content Change (Acc) and Audio Information Introduced (Aii): (Lang, Gao, Potter, Lee, Park, &
- Bailey, 2015)
- Description.
- Administration
- Profile 9 Communicative Adaptability Scale (CAS): (Duran, 1983)
- Profile 10 Communication Competency Assessment Instrument (CCAI): (Rubin, 1982a, 1982b)
- Profile 11 Communication Functions Questionnaire (CFQ-30): (Samter &
- Burleson, 1990)
- Profile 12 Conversational Listening Span (CLS): (Janusik, 2004, 2005, 2007)
- Profile 13 Conversational Sensitivity Scale (CSS): (Daly, Vangelisti, &
- Daughton, 1987)
- Profile 14 The Couples Helping Exercise: (Barker &
- Lemle, 1984, 1987)
- Profile 15 Doctors' Interpersonal Skills Questionnaire (DISQ): (Greco, Cavanagh, Brownlea, &
- McGovern, 1999)
- Instrument Type.
- Description
- Profile 16 Effective Listening and Interactive Communication Scale (ELICS): (King, Servais, Bolack, Shepherd, &
- Willoughby, 2012)
- Profile 17 Empathic Accuracy: Standard Stimulus Paradigm (EA-SSP): (Marangoni, Garcia, Ickes, &
- Teng, 1995)
- Profile 18 Empathic Accuracy: Unstructured Dyadic Interaction Paradigm (EA-UDIP): (Ickes, Stinson, Bissonnette, &
- Garcia, 1990)
- Profile 19 Facilitating Listening Scale (FLS): (Bouskila-Yam &
- Kluger, 2011)
- Profile 20 Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ): (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, &
- Toney, 2006)
- Profile 21 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): (Belliveau et al., 1991)
- Sample Studies.
- Critique
- Profile 22 Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS): (Aron &
- Aron, 1997)
- Profile 23 HURIER Listening Profile: (Brownell, 1996)
- Profile 24 Informational Reception Apprehension Test (IRAT): (Wheeless, Preiss, &
- Gayle, 1997)
- Profile 25 Interaction Involvement Scale (IIS): (Cegala, 1981
- Cegala, Savage, Brunner, &
- Conrad, 1982)
- Profile 26 Feffer's Interpersonal Decentering: (Feffer, Leeper, Dobbs, Jenkins, &
- Perez, 2008)
- Profile 27 Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR): (Kagan, 1976, 1980a
- Kagan &
- Kagan, 1997)
- Profile 28 Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI): (Davis, 1980)
- Reliability.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 1-119-10293-6
- 1-119-10299-5
- OCLC:
- 989520189
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.