My Account Log in

2 options

Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness and Holes in the Safety Net / Bruce D. Meyer, Nikolas Mittag.

HeinOnline American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Available online

View online

NBER Working papers Available online

View online
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Meyer, Bruce D.
Contributor:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mittag, Nikolas.
Series:
Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w21676.
NBER working paper series no. w21676
Language:
English
Physical Description:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Other Title:
Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income
Place of Publication:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2015.
Summary:
We examine the consequences of underreporting of transfer programs for prototypical analyses of low-income populations using the Current Population Survey (CPS), the source of official poverty and inequality statistics. We link administrative data for food stamps, TANF, General Assistance, and subsidized housing from New York State to the CPS at the individual level. Program receipt in the CPS is missed for over one-third of housing assistance recipients, 40 percent of food stamp recipients and 60 percent of TANF and General Assistance recipients. Dollars of benefits are also undercounted for reporting recipients, particularly for TANF, General Assistance and housing assistance. We find that the survey data sharply understate the income of poor households. Underreporting in the survey data also greatly understates the effects of anti-poverty programs and changes our understanding of program targeting. Using the combined data rather than survey data alone, the poverty reducing effect of all programs together is nearly doubled while the effect of housing assistance is tripled. We also re-examine the coverage of the safety net, specifically the share of people without work or program receipt. Using the administrative measures of program receipt rather than the survey ones often reduces the share of single mothers falling through the safety net by one-half or more.
Notes:
Print version record
October 2015.

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account