1 option
Organizing doubt : grounded theory, army units and dealing with dynamic complexity / Eric-Hans Kramer.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Kramer, Eric-Hans, author.
- Series:
- Advances in organization studies.
- Advances in Organization Studies
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Armies--Organization.
- Armies.
- Self-organizing systems.
- Crisis management.
- Organizational change.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (277 p.)
- Edition:
- 1st ed.
- Place of Publication:
- Frederiksberg, Denmark : Copenhagen Business School Press, 2007.
- Summary:
- Military organizations operate in complex environments and difficult circumstances. During deployment, armies are confronted with dangers, cunning enemies, unexpected changes, and a general level of uncertainty. The obvious implication is that armies need to be able to deal with complexity, or dynamic complexity as it will be labeled in this book.Ã?Â?Ã?Â?This study develops an analytical framework that is composed of different ingredients of formal theory. Central to this framework is the idea that the ability to 'doubt' is of crucial importance for organizations that are confronted with dynamic complexity. From this it follows that organizations need to organize their ability to doubt in such environments. The framework is used to analyze the way military units of the Dutch Armed Forces, when deployed to perform peace operations, dealt with dynamic complexity. Subsequently, it is analyzed how specific organizational characteristics of the mother organization in the Netherlands influenced the ability of the deployed units to organize doubt.
- Contents:
- Intro
- Organizing Doubt - Grounded Theory, Army Units and Dealing with Dynamic Complexity
- Copyright
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Central issues
- The concept of dynamic complexity
- Experiences of military organizations with the challenges of dynamic complexity
- Peace operations and conventional military operations
- The methodological approach
- Organizing Doubt
- The different parts of this study
- Part I: The architecture of this study
- Chapter 1: The architecture of this study
- 1.1 The background
- 1.2 The starting point of this study
- 1.3 The relevance of the core concept
- The problems of operational units in the cases
- (Potential) danger
- Unforeseen situations
- The problematic neutral position
- No consistent effects of operations
- A dispersed way of operating
- 1.4 The implications of choosing 'dynamic complexity' as a core concept
- The implications of choosing dynamic complexity as a core concept
- The consequences for this study: the issue of design
- 1.5 The goal and central questions of this study
- The relevance of the study
- Central questions
- Conceptual model
- Important definitions
- 1.6 An overview
- Chapter 2: Methodological considerations
- 2.1 Methodological characteristics of the case studies
- Research projects at the Military Academy
- Exploratory phase
- Specification phase
- 2.2 Methodological structure of this study
- Research strategy
- Part Four
- Part Five
- Selection of the cases
- Data collection
- Data analysis
- Analytical framework
- Research Process
- 2.3 Methodological position
- Pragmatism
- Selectivity: heuristics and maps
- Analytical abduction
- Normative claims and causation
- The substantive theory and usefulness
- Part II: Analytical framework: Dealing with dynamic complexity.
- Chapter 3: Systems theory as background
- 3.1 Connecting multiple levels of explanation
- The circularity of agency and structure
- 3.2 Systems theory as a macro theoretical framework
- 3.3 A history of systems theory
- Three paradigms
- 3.4 Dynamic complexity and the problem of openness
- Making a system/environment distinction
- 3.5 Final remarks
- Chapter 4: The concept of dynamic complexity and the organizing problem
- 4.1 The basic problem of dealing with dynamic complexity
- A problematic environment
- The organizing problem
- 4.2 The problem of openness as the essence of the organizing problem
- 4.3 Final remarks
- Chapter 5: A model of dealing with dynamic complexity
- 5.1. A description of meaningful action
- 5.2 A model of organizing
- The various elements in the model
- The dynamic process portrayed by the model
- The connection between acting and thinking
- Contradiction in the body of hypotheses
- 5.3 Positioning Weick
- Traces of self-referential thinking
- Structuration in Weick
- The consequences for this study
- Chapter 6: Normative aspect of the organizing model
- 6.1 Normative elements in the organizing model
- The importance of doubt
- 6.2 The concept of doubt and its intricacies
- Doubt as the foundation of self-organization
- 6.3 Organizing doubt
- 6.4 The influence of design on operational units
- 6.5 Weick and 'naturalistic decision-making'
- 6.6 Final remarks
- Chapter 7: Doubt and argumentation
- 7.1 The concept of 'argumentation'
- 7.2 Similarities between Billig and Weick
- Premises of rhetorical psychology
- The structuring and de-structuring effects of argumentation
- 7.3 Argumentation and its subtleties
- 7.4 Consequences of the previous discussions
- 7.5 Conclusions from part two
- Part III: Analytical framework: Organizing doubt in an organizational system.
- Chapter 8: Organizing doubt
- 8.1 What is well-organized argumentation?
- Organizing and argumentation
- 8.2 Perspectives on organizing argumentation
- Meaningful argumentation as a complicated concept
- 8.3 Analyzing the organization of doubt in the cases
- 8.4 Organizing argumentation: Billig and Habermass
- Why Billig's account on argumentation is preferred
- 8.5 Final Remarks
- Chapter 9: Doubt and the organizational structure
- 9.1 The influence of organizational structure on argumentation
- 9.2 Analyzing self-organizing potential in the cases
- 1. Create the whole in the parts
- 2. Requisite variety
- 3. Redundancy
- 4. Minimal critical specification
- 5. Double-loop learning ('learning to learn')
- 9.3 Implications of the previous discussions
- Chapter 10: Leadership and the internal structure of argumentation
- 10.1 Dynamic complexity and self-organizing units
- 10.2 Leadership in a self-organizing unit
- Deficiencies in group functioning
- 10.3 The spirit of contradiction
- 10.4 Specific influence of leaders on argumentation
- Selecting topics for debate
- Providing expert knowledge
- Attending the process of debate
- Influencing the external structure of debate
- 10.5 Vision and argumentation
- 10.6 Analyzing leadership in the cases
- 10.7 Engaging the object of study: The function of the analytical framework
- Part IV: Analyzing the cases
- Chapter 11: Peace operations according to the Army
- 11.1 Peace operations according to the doctrine
- 11.2 'Peace operations' as a fuzzy category
- 11.3 Peace operations and complexity
- Mission Command
- 11.4 An illustration: KFOR (1999)
- 11.5 The Army and dealing with dynamic complexity
- Chapter 12: The Logistic and Transport Battalion
- 12.1 General Description
- The operational units
- The rotation policy
- 12.2 Dealing with dynamic complexity.
- Practical problems of operational units
- Tackling the practical problems
- 12.3 The structure of the operational units
- The whole in the parts
- Requisite variety
- Redundancy of functions
- Minimal critical specifications
- Double-loop learning
- 12.4 Leadership
- 12.5 The resulting hypotheses
- Chapter 13: SFOR
- 13.1 General description
- The nature of the elements
- 13.2 Dealing with dynamic complexity
- Practical problems for operational units
- 13.3 The structure of the operational units
- 13.4 Leadership
- Leaders as spiders in the information web
- Leaders as managers of information
- Leaders as clarifiers of the 'framework of meaning' surrounding the operations
- Leaders as protectors of those at the operational level
- 13.5 The resulting hypotheses
- Chapter 14: Dutchbat
- 14.1 General description
- 14.2 Dealing with dynamic complexity
- 14.3 The structure of the operational units
- Minimal critical specification
- 14.4 Leadership
- Leaders as managers of the internal affairs of units
- Leaders as arguers about the usefulness of the mission
- 14.5 The resulting hypotheses
- 14.6 Final remarks
- Part V: The influence of the mother organization
- Chapter 15: The influence of the mother organization
- 15.1 Indications of the influences of the mother organization
- Differences between the cases
- Similarity
- 15.2 The influence of structural characteristics of the mother organization.
- 15.3 The ambitions of the reflection
- Chapter 16: The Army doctrine and dealing with dynamic complexity
- 16.1 A description of the doctrine
- 16.2 The military doctrine and the analytical framework
- The definition of complexity
- The concept of self-organization
- 'Situations' for Mission Command
- Implementation of initiative
- Operational units that are 'out of control'
- 16.3 The military doctrine and the SFOR case
- 16.4 Hypotheses about the influence of the doctrine
- Chapter 17: The influence of the organizational structure
- 17.1 The organizational structure of the mother organization
- Crisis organizations according to the Army
- 17.2 The influence of the assembly process
- The process of assembly and the organizational structure
- The 'direction' of assembly
- 17.3 The direct effect of the organizational structure
- Not made for crisis operations
- 17.4 Hypotheses about the influence of theorganizationalstructure
- Chapter 18: The influence of leadership structures
- 18.1 The nature of the leadership structures
- 18.2 The leadership structures
- The organizational structure
- Command and control
- The distinction between officers and soldiers
- 18.3 The education of leaders
- Socialization
- Isolation
- The intellectual climate at the Academy
- 18.4 Hypotheses about the influence of leadership
- Part VI
- Chapter 19: Implications of the reflection
- 19.1 The substantive theory
- 19.2 Proposals for future research
- Proposal 1: 'further research is necessary'
- Proposal 2: The Army and self-organization
- Proposal 3: Changing the organizational structure
- Proposal 4: Leadership as a problem
- Proposal 5: A psychoanalytic approach to organizational change
- 19.3 Final remarks
- Appendix I
- Appendix II
- References to the Logtbat case study
- References to the SFOR case study.
- References to the Dutchbat case study.
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
- Description based on print version record.
- ISBN:
- 87-630-0306-6
- OCLC:
- 935248849
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.