My Account Log in

1 option

Word formation in parallel architecture : the case for a separate component / Pius ten Hacken.

Van Pelt Library PE1175 .H33 2019
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Hacken, Pius ten, author.
Series:
SpringerBriefs in linguistics
Springer briefs in linguistics
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
English language--Word formation.
English language.
Onomastics.
Grammar, Comparative and general.
Physical Description:
vi, 99 pages ; 24 cm.
Place of Publication:
Cham, Switzerland : Springer, [2019]
Summary:
This book aims to reconcile the generative considerations of Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture (PA) with the European structuralist approach to naming. It shows that there are good reasons to single out word formation as a separate component in PA. It demonstrates that it is a drawback not to distinguish word formation, and explains that the function of word formation rules is different from the function of the lexicon and rules of grammar. After making the argument for a separate word formation component, the book sets out to determine which types of rule qualify as part of this component. Traditionally, the boundaries of word formation with inflection and with syntax have been a matter of debate. By focusing on the naming function, the book poses a guiding principle for determining which rules should be in the word formation component. The position of morphology in the architecture of grammar has always been an issue of debate in generative linguistics. Since Chomsky (1970), this question has been framed in terms of the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Compared to Chomsky's architectures, Jackendoff's Parallel Architecture places phonetic and conceptual structures at the same level as syntactic structure, i.e. connected by bidirectional linking rules rather than interpretation rules. One of the consequences is that PA does not formally distinguish lexicon entries from rules of grammar. This changes the setting for the question of the autonomy of morphology, because the Lexicalist Hypothesis depends on this distinction.-- Provided by publisher.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:
3030180085
9783030180089
OCLC:
1090280260

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account