3 options
Beyond GDP : measuring welfare and assessing sustainability / Marc Fleurbaey and Didier Blanchet.
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Fleurbaey, Marc.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Welfare economics.
- Gross domestic product.
- Economic policy.
- Social policy.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (323 p.)
- Place of Publication:
- Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, c2013.
- Language Note:
- English
- Summary:
- Is GDP a good proxy for social welfare? Building on economic theory, this book confirms that it is not, but also that most alternatives to it share its basic flaw, i.e., a focus on specific aspects of people's lives without sufficiently taking account of people's values and goals. A better approach is possible.
- Contents:
- Cover; Contents; Introduction: The Four Musketeers; 1. A Wealth of Indicators; 1.1. Introduction; 1.2. A bird's-eye view; 1.3. Aggregating the nonaggregatable?; 1.4. Correcting GDP; 1.5. Sustainability assessment: weak or strong?; 1.6. Coping with multidimensionality: dashboards; 1.7. The core question: how far can aggregation go?; 2. Measuring Sustainability; 2.1. Introduction; 2.2. Wealth and sustainable well-being; 2.2.1. Discounting future streams of well-being?; 2.2.2. From intertemporal well-being to sustainable consumption; 2.3. The savings approach: a reference framework
- 2.3.1. Shifting the focus to sustainability: why?2.3.2. Sustainability in imperfect but predictable economies; 2.3.3. An example; 2.4. The savings approach: many problems remain; 2.4.1. Monetization in practice; 2.4.2. Behavioral indeterminacy, or when "weak" indicators can turn out too strong; 2.4.3. Technological and normative uncertainties; 2.4.4. An additional problem: the cross-national dimension of unsustainability; 2.5. Conclusion: where to go from here?; 3. A Price for Everything?; 3.1. A revealed preference argument; 3.1.1. The argument for an individual consumer
- 3.1.2. Extending the argument to social welfare through a representative agent3.1.3. Extending the argument to social welfare with an optimality assumption; 3.2. A variant of the revealed preference argument; 3.3. The theory of index numbers; 3.3.1. An axiomatic approach; 3.3.2. Approximating welfare changes; 3.4. Decomposing welfare; 3.4.1. A first decomposition, with the social expenditure function; 3.4.2. A second decomposition, in terms of efficiency and equity; 3.4.3. A new decomposition, based on Bergson curves; 3.4.4. Another decomposition, for small variations
- 3.5. Specific problems with imputed prices and full income3.6. Conclusion; 4. Equivalent Income, or How to Value What Has No Price; 4.1. Money-metric utility and equivalent income; 4.2. Knockout criticisms?; 4.2.1. Not welfarist enough; 4.2.2. Too welfarist; 4.2.3. Potentially regressive; 4.2.4. Reference dependent; 4.2.5. Arrow's coup de grâce; 4.3. Fairness to the rescue; 4.3.1. The equivalence approach in fair allocation theory; 4.3.2. Arrow Independence is not compelling; 4.3.3. References need not be arbitrary; 4.3.4. The right dose of welfarism; 4.3.5. Bundle dominance is unacceptable
- 4.3.6. Egalitarianism is demanding4.4. Social welfare decomposition; 4.5. Conclusion; 5. Is Happiness All that Matters?; 5.1. The Easterlin paradox: Have we been wrong for 70,000 years?; 5.1.1. Bentham is back; 5.1.2. The debate about subjective welfarism; 5.1.3. Is happiness the ultimate goal?; 5.1.4. The key objection to subjective scores; 5.2. A theory of subjective well-being; 5.2.1. Affects and judgments; 5.2.2. The three problems of the respondent; 5.2.3. Heterogeneous and shifting standards; 5.2.4. What do people care about?; 5.2.5. Comparisons across preferences
- 5.3. Making use of happiness data
- Notes:
- Description based upon print version of record.
- Description based on online resource; title from home page (viewed on Apr. 24, 2013).
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 0-19-934691-7
- 0-19-934415-9
- OCLC:
- 843880796
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.