Form regulation to address new construction in historic districts / Meredith Seiz Johnson.

Format:

Book

Manuscript

Thesis/Dissertation

Author/Creator:

Johnson, Meredith Seiz, author.

Contributor:

Hollenberg, David, degree supervisor.

University of Pennsylvania. Department of Historic Preservation, degree granting institution.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Penn theses--Historic preservation.

Historic preservation--Penn theses.

Local Subjects:

Penn theses--Historic preservation.

Historic preservation--Penn theses.

Physical Description:

vi,108 leaves : illustrations (chiefly color), plans ; 29 cm

Production:

[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : University of Pennsylvania, 2019.

Summary:

This thesis will evaluate several tools that cities are currently using to regulate the form of new construction, large alterations, and additions in designated historic areas. A number of tools are available to achieve this type of regulation, but the most popular tools tend to be place-specific design guidelines derived from the study of a historic district, associated with an overlay designation established by the city's zoning code. Throughout this thesis, this type of regulation will be referred to as "traditional tools." "Non-traditional tools," as used herein, include things like form-based codes or neighborhood conservation districts. These are tools that have not been as widely used or are relatively new to the regulatory landscape. The tools evaluated in this thesis will be examined through case studies and include a mix of traditional tools and non-traditional tools. The traditional tool case studies are New Orleans, LA, and Savannah, GA. The non-traditional tool case studies are Beaufort, SC, which is used a case study for both traditional and nontraditional tools, and Philadelphia, PA.

Notes:

M.S. University of Pennsylvania 2019.

Department: Historic Preservation.

Supervisor: David Hollenberg.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

OCLC:

1110727952