My Account Log in

1 option

The jury crisis : what's wrong with jury trials and how we can save them / Drury R. Sherrod.

Van Pelt Library KF9680 .S54 2019
Loading location information...

Available This item is available for access.

Log in to request item
Format:
Book
Author/Creator:
Sherrod, Drury R., author.
Language:
English
Subjects (All):
Jury--United States.
Jury.
United States.
Physical Description:
xx, 171 pages ; 24 cm
Place of Publication:
Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield, [2019]
Summary:
Juries have a bad reputation. Often jurors are seen as incompetent, biased and unpredictable, and jury trials are seen as a waste of time and money. In fact, so few criminal and civil cases reach a jury today that trial by jury is on the verge of extinction. Juries are being replaced by mediators, arbitrators and private judges. The wise trial of "Twelve Angry Men" has become a fiction. As a result, a foundation of American democracy is about to vanish. The Jury Crisis: What's Wrong with Jury Trials and How We Can Save Them addresses the near collapse of the jury trial in America - its causes, consequences, and cures. Drury Sherrod brings his unique perspective as a social psychologist who became a jury consultant to the reader, applying psychological research to real world trials and explaining why juries have become dysfunctional. While this collapse of the jury can be traced to multiple causes, including poor public education, the absence of peers and community standards in a class-stratified, racially divided society, and people's reluctance to serve on a jury, the focus of this book is on the conduct of trials themselves, from jury selection to evidence presentation to jury deliberations. Judges and lawyers believe - wrongly - that jurors can put aside their biases, sit quietly through hours, days or weeks of conflicting testimony, and not make up their minds until they have heard all the evidence. Unfortunately, the human brain doesn't work that way. A great deal of psychological research on jurors and other decision-makers shows that our brains intuitively leap to story-telling before we rationally analyze "facts," or evidence. Weaving details into a narrative is how we make sense of the world, and it's very hard to suppress this tendency. Consequently, a majority of jurors actually make up their minds before they have heard much of the evidence. Judges, arbitrators and mediators have similar biases. The Jury Crisis deals with an important social problem, namely the near collapse of a thousand year old institution, and proposes how to fix the jury system and restore trial by jury to a more prominent place in American society.
Contents:
1 Triers of Fact p. 1
2 Supplying Facts in Early Juries p. 13
3 How Jurors Use Facts to Tell Stories p. 23
4 Why Jurors Prefer Stories over Facts p. 33
5 Jury Selection: Identifying Who Will Tell Which Stories p. 45
6 Jury Selection in a Product-Liability Lawsuit p. 57
7 Jury Deliberations: The Stories Widen p. 69
8 Jury Deliberations in Real Trials p. 77
9 Storytellers in Robes p. 89
10 The Biases behind Judges' Stories p. 101
11 The Vanishing Jury p. 113
12 Trying the Jury Trial p. 123
13 Junk the Jury or Fix the Flaws? p. 135.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Other Format:
Online version: Sherrod, Drury R. Jury crisis.
ISBN:
9781538109533
1538109530
OCLC:
1040207353

The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.

Find

Home Release notes

My Account

Shelf Request an item Bookmarks Fines and fees Settings

Guides

Using the Find catalog Using Articles+ Using your account