2 options
Comparison of Post-9/11 GI Bill and Pell Grant Administration.
Connect to full text Available online
View onlineProQuest Congressional Research Digital Collection: Part C (2011 forward) Available online
View online- Format:
- Book
- Government document
- Author/Creator:
- Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Claims.
- Federal aid to higher education.
- Physical Description:
- 1 online resource (1 online resource (60 pages)) : digital, PDF file
- monochrome
- Place of Publication:
- [Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 2015.
- System Details:
- System requirements: PDF reader software.
- text file
- Summary:
- Compares and contrasts administration of the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Post-9/11 GI Bill), enacted as Title V of P.L. 110-252, the 2008 Supplemental Appropriations Act; and Federal Pell Grants, as authorized by Title IV-A-1 of the Higher Education Act (HEA). Provides brief overview of both programs and a table summarizing key administrative activities and differences. Includes in-depth explanation of administrative activities from the application process to the calculation of benefits to the disbursement of funds and the process for participants and educational institutions to resolve GI Bill payments that exceeded a participant eligibility. Highlights associated and articulated issues and concerns about administrative processes to explicate opportunities for improvement in each.
- Notes:
- CRS Report.
- Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed Aug. 2015). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.
- Other Format:
- Microfiche version: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Comparison of Post-9/11 GI Bill and Pell Grant Administration
- Access Restriction:
- Restricted for use by site license.
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.