U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. William Randolph Hearst v. Hugo L. Black, Sherman Minton, Lewis B. Schwellenbach, Lynn J. Frazier, and Ernest W. Gibson, as Special Committee of U.S. Senate to Investigate Lobbying Activities, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., Respondents. Objections to Allowance of Special Appeal. by Crampton Harris, Special Attorney for U.S. Senate Committee, under Special Appearance.

Format:

Book

Government document

Author/Creator:

United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate Lobbying Activities.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Appellate procedure.

Lobbying.

Telegraph.

Physical Description:

1 online resource (25 pages) : digital, PDF file

monochrome

Place of Publication:

[Place of publication not identified] : [publisher not identified], 1936.

System Details:

System requirements: PDF reader software.

text file

PDF

Summary:

On rights of Special Committee and Federal Communications Commission to subpoena certain of Mr. Hearst's telegrams without violating freedom of the press.

Notes:

Record is based on bibliographic data in ProQuest U.S. Congressional Research Digital Collection (last viewed May 2010). Reuse except for individual research requires license from ProQuest, LLC.

Other Format:

Microfiche version: United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee to Investigate Lobbying Activities.. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. William Randolph Hearst v. Hugo L. Black, Sherman Minton, Lewis B. Schwellenbach, Lynn J. Frazier, and Ernest W. Gibson, as Special Committee of U.S. Senate to Investigate Lobbying Activities, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., Respondents. Objections to Allowance of Special Appeal. by Crampton Harris, Special Attorney for U.S. Senate Committee, under Special Appearance S5331

Access Restriction:

Restricted for use by site license.