1 option
Correcting the scholarly record for research integrity : in the aftermath of plagiarism / M. V. Dougherty.
Van Pelt Library Q180.55.M67 D68 2018
Available
- Format:
- Book
- Author/Creator:
- Dougherty, M. V., 1973- author.
- Series:
- Research ethics forum ; v. 6.
- Research ethics forum ; volume 6
- Language:
- English
- Subjects (All):
- Plagiarism.
- Research--Moral and ethical aspects.
- Research.
- Science--Moral and ethical aspects.
- Science.
- Integrity.
- Physical Description:
- 248 pages ; 24 cm.
- Place of Publication:
- Swizterland : Springer, [2018]
- Summary:
- This volume is the first book-length study on post-publication responses to academic plagiarism in humanities disciplines. It demonstrates that the correction of the scholarly literature for plagiarism is not a task for editors and publishers alone; each member of the research community has an indispensable role in maintaining the integrity of the published literature in the aftermath of plagiarism. If untreated, academic plagiarism damages the integrity of the scholarly record, corrupts the surrounding academic enterprise, and creates inefficiencies across all levels of knowledge production. By providing case studies from the field of philosophy and related disciplines, the volume exhibits that current post-publication responses to academic plagiarism are insufficient. It catalogues how humanities disciplines fall short in comparison with the natural and biomedical sciences for ensuring the integrity of the body of published research. This volume provides clarity about how to conceptualize the scholarly record, surveys the traditional methods for correcting it, and argues for new interventions to improve the reliability of the body of published research. The book is valuable not only to those in the field of philosophy and other humanities disciplines, but also to those interested in research ethics, meta-science, and the sociology of research.
- Contents:
- Correcting the scholarly record
- The integrity of authorship
- Pre-publication and post-publication responses to plagiarism
- The purpose of academic publishing
- A précis of chapters
- 2. Defining the scholarly record
- The limits of the scholarly record
- Works at the margin of the scholarly record
- The scholarly record in transition
- The indentity of items of the scholarly record
- A definable scholarly record
- 3. What is academic plagiarism?
- Identifying academic plagiarism
- The intent to plagiarize
- Self-plagiarism
- Euphemisms for academic plagiarism
- Plagiarism vs. copyright infringement
- Statutes of limitation for plagiarism
- In sum
- 4. A test case for published corrections : the discipline of philosophy
- Classifying responses to plagiarism
- Issuing an expression of concern
- Issuing a statement of retraction
- Reprinting a volume after the removal of plagiarized material
- Halting the sale of the plagiarized material
- Taking no public action
- The varying quality of corrections in philosophy
- 5. Academic whistleblowing
- The whistleblowing dilemma
- To whom can one blow the academic whistle?
- Multi-targeted whistleblowing
- How will the whistleblowing impact the academic whistleblower?
- What might whistleblower harassment and academic witness intimidation look-like?
- Appendix : Sample letters for requesting corrections of the scholarly record
- 6. Publishing corrections of the scholarly record : some test cases
- Disambiguating retractions, errata, and corrigenda
- Twelve corrections of the scholarly record
- Using the correct tools of correction
- Responsibility for problems with the scholarly record
- 7. Contested authorship, self-plagiarism, and the scholarly record
- 8. Beyond the published retraction.
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
- ISBN:
- 3319994344
- 9783319994345
- OCLC:
- 1044859145
The Penn Libraries is committed to describing library materials using current, accurate, and responsible language. If you discover outdated or inaccurate language, please fill out this feedback form to report it and suggest alternative language.