Formally verified quantum programming / Robert Rand.

Format:

Book

Manuscript

Thesis/Dissertation

Author/Creator:

Rand, Robert, author.

Contributor:

Zdancewic, Steve, degree supervisor.

Panangaden, P. (Prakash), degree committee member.

Pierce, Benjamin, degree committee member.

Tannen, Val, 1953- degree committee member.

Weirich, Stephanie, degree committee member.

University of Pennsylvania. Department of Computer and Information Science, degree granting institution.

Language:

English

Subjects (All):

Penn dissertations--Computer and information science.

Computer and information science--Penn dissertations.

Local Subjects:

Penn dissertations--Computer and information science.

Computer and information science--Penn dissertations.

Physical Description:

x, 212 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm

Production:

[Philadelphia, Pennsylvania] : University of Pennsylvania, 2018.

Summary:

The field of quantum mechanics predates computer science by at least ten years, the time between the publication of the Schrodinger equation and the Church-Turing thesis. It took another fifty years for Feynman to recognize that harnessing quantum mechanics is necessary to efficiently simulate physics and for David Deutsch to propose the quantum Turing machine. After thirty more years, we are finally getting close to the first general-purpose quantum computers based upon prototypes by IBM, Intel, Google and others. While physicists and engineers have worked on building scalable quantum computers, theoretical computer scientists have made their own advances. Complexity theorists introduced quantum complexity classes like BQP and QMA; Shor and Grover developed their famous algorithms for factoring and unstructured search. Programming languages researchers pursued two main research directions: Small-scale languages like QPL and the quantum lambda-calculi for reasoning about quantum computation and large-scale languages like Quipper and Q# for industrial-scale quantum software development. This thesis aims to unify these two threads while adding a third one: formal verification. We argue that quantum programs demand machine-checkable proofs of correctness. We justify this on the basis of the complexity of programs manipulating quantum states, the expense of running quantum programs, and the inapplicability of traditional debugging techniques to programs whose states cannot be examined. We further argue that the existing mathematical models of quantum computation make this an easier task than one could reasonably expect. In light of these observations we introduce QWIRE, a tool for writing verifiable, large scale quantum programs. QWIRE is not merely a language for writing and verifying quantum circuits: it is a verified circuit description language. This means that the semantics of QWIRE circuits are verified in the Coq proof assistant. We also implement verified abstractions, like ancilla management and reversible circuit compilation. Finally, we turn QWIRE and Coq's abilities outwards, towards verifying popular quantum algorithms like quantum teleportation. We argue that this tool provides a solid foundation for research into quantum programming languages and formal verification going forward.

Notes:

Ph. D. University of Pennsylvania 2018.

Department: Computer and Information Science.

Supervisor: Steve Zdancewic.

Includes bibliographical references.

OCLC:

1240670840